SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 690

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Yogesh Shah (Dr. ) – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Arjun Agrawal for petitioner; Shrey Raj Saxena, Deputy Advocate General for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashment of the orders Annexure P/7 & P/8 by which the application of the petitioner for voluntary retirement as per the unamended rule of 42-A of M.P. Civil Services Pension Rules, 1976 (hereinafter referred as Pension Rules) prevailing at the time of the submission of the application has been rejected and the same has been communicated by letter dated 9.2.2012.

2. Draped in brevity the facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed on 17.12.1985 to the post of Assistant Surgeon/Insurance Health Officer in Directorate Employee State Insurance Services on an ad-hoc basis. The services of the petitioner were regularised for the post of Assistant Surgeon/Insurance Health Officer vide order dated 26.6.1987. The petitioner submitted an application for voluntary retirement and served a notice in Form 28 both on 21.3.2006.

3. On 7.4.2006 rule 42 and 42-A of the Pension Rules were amended and as per rule 42(1)(a) the minimum qualifying service for seeking voluntary retirement was raised from 15 years to 20 years. Further rule 42-A was amended and earlier the qualifying service was increa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top