SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 129

SATISH KUMAR SHARMA
Shyamlal Vyas (Dead) – Appellant
Versus
Inderchand (Dead) – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi for applicants; Sanjeev Jain for respondents No. 1 and 2, Kamal Mangal for respondent No. 3.

ORDER

1. This petition has been filed by the landlord-applicants against the order dated 22.10.2021 passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Laskar, Gwalior (M.P.) in Eviction Case No.24/95-96X90-7, whereby the application filed by the intervenor-respondents under Order 1 rule 10 of the CPC for impledment has been allowed.

2. Brief relevant facts for disposal of this petition are that the applicants had filed an eviction application under section 23-A of M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 against the respondent No. 2 on the ground of bona-fide requirement of his son before the Rent Control Authority, Gwalior. The respondent No. 3 intervenor filed an application under Order 1 rule 10 for impleadment in these eviction proceedings with the averment that it has obtained possession of the rented shop from the respondents tenant No.1 & 2 in the execution of a decree passed by the civil Court in its favour. The application of the intervener has been allowed by the impugned order against which this petition has been filed by the landlord/applicants.

3. Heard learned counsel for both the sides and perused the material available on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top