SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 169

NANDITA DUBEY
Kavita Dehalwar (Mrs. ) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
H. K. Upadhyay for petitioner;
Pushpendra Yadav, Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No.1 /Union; Yogesh Bhatnagar for respondents No. 2 to 7.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred against the order dated 29.5.2015 and also the order dated 5.3.2015 passed by the Director, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, whereby the appointment order of petitioner dated 10.8.2005 has been cancelled with immediate effect.

2. Petitioner holds a Bachelor degree in Architecture (B Arch.) in First Division of the year 2002 from Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology and also registered with the Council of Architecture and has experience of having work as associate in a private Architecture firm.

3. The respondent No.2 is Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal (hereinafter referred to as Institute), a deemed University under the National Institute of Technology Act. The Institute invited applications for 47 posts of Lecturers, 13 posts of Assistant Professors, two posts of Assistant Librarians and one post of Training and Placement Officer in the rank of Professor. The essential qualifications for the aforeadvertised posts was as per the AICTE norm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top