SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 418

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BENCH
G.S. AHLUWALIA, J.
Pradeep Sakhawar – Appellant
Versus
State of M.P. and Another – Respondents
MCRC No. 35848 of 2021
Decided On : 25-02-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : J.S. Rathore.
For the Respondent: Naval Kishore Gupta.

Headnote:

Cr.P.C. - Criminal Appeal - Sections 364/34, 302/34, 201/34 - The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The appellant has preferred this criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) against the judgment dated 29.02.2008 passed by the 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Indore (M.P.) in S.T. No.50/2006, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Sections 364/34, 302/34 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced as under: S. No Conviction Sentence Imprisonment Fine amount Additional imprisonment in default of payment of fine 1 302/34 of IPC Life imprisonment Rs.10,000/- 6 months RI 2 364/34 of IPC 10 years RI Rs.2,000/- 3 months RI 3 201/34 of IPC 3 years RI Rs.1,000/- 1 month RI

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted under Sections 364/34, 302/34, and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced accordingly. The prosecution's case was based on the last seen evidence and the appellant's statements recorded during the trial of a co-accused. The appellant pleaded false implication and abjured his guilt, but the trial court found the prosecution's case proved beyond reasonable doubt.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the appellant guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 364/34 of IPC and sentenced him accordingly. However, the court acquitted the appellant from the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of IPC due to lack of evidence. The fine amount deposited by the appellant under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of IPC was ordered to be refunded to the appellant.

Issues: The issues revolved around the appellant's involvement in the crime, the credibility of the last seen evidence, and the admissibility of the appellant's statements recorded during the trial of a co-accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the last seen evidence and the appellant's statements recorded during the trial of a co-accused to establish the appellant's guilt for the offence punishable under Section 364/34 of IPC. The court also emphasized the lack of evidence for the appellant's involvement in the other offences, leading to his acquittal.

Final Decision: The appeal filed by the appellant was partly allowed, modifying the judgment and order of conviction. The appellant was acquitted from the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of IPC, while the conviction and sentence for the offence punishable under Section 364/34 of IPC were affirmed. The fine amount deposited by the appellant under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of IPC was ordered to be refunded to the appellant.

JUDGMENT :

Satyendra Kumar Singh, J.

The appellant has preferred this criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) [in short “Cr.P.C.”] against the judgment dated 29.02.2008 passed by the 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Indore (M.P.) in S.T. No.50/2006, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Sections 364/34, 302/34 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short “IPC”) and sentenced as under :

S. No.

Conviction

Sentence

Imprisonment

Fine amount

Additional imprisonment in default of payment of fine

1

302/34 of IPC

Life imprisonment

Rs.10,000/-

6 months RI

2

364/34 of IPC

10 years RI

Rs.2,000/-

3 months RI

3

201/34 of IPC

3 years RI

Rs.1,000/-

1 month RI

2. Prosecution story, in brief is as follows :-

    (i) That on 03.10.2005, at about 10.00 PM, while complainant Satyanarayan was standing at square near his residence 38/2, Jaibhawani Nagar, Indore alongwith his friends Balli Kushwah, Pappu Ghatge, Pappu Sharma, Manoj Solanki and brother deceased Kamal making preparations for Nav Durga puja, appellant and co-accused Sanjay came there and took the deceased Kamal with them on the motorcycle, which co-accused Sanjay was driving whom deceased referred as his brother-in-law. Deceased Kamal thereafter did not return home. Next day, on being enquired about the whereabouts of the deceased, co-accused Sanjay informed that he dropped Kamal outside his house on the same night. When deceased Kamal did not return till late night, then at about 23.55 hours, missing person's report (Exhibit-P/11) was lodged by Rakesh at police station Aerodrome, Indore. Thereafter, on 05.10.2005, Satynarayan made a written complaint (Exhibit-P/1) to SHO Police Station Aerodrome, Indore against the appellant and co-accused Sanjay on the basis of suspicion as deceased had a fight with the co-accused Sanjay some 7-8 days prior to the date of incident and appellant, on being enquired about the whereabouts of the deceased told different version than that of co-accused that he dropped the deceased outside his in-law's house. S.I. Ashok Rangshahi, on the basis of aforesaid written complaint, lodged FIR (Exhibit-P/2) against the appellant as well as co-accused Sanjay for the offences punishable under Section 364 read with 34 of IPC.

(ii) During investigation, on 06.10.2005, ASI P. S. Chouhan went to the place of incident, prepared spot map (Exhibit-P/3), recorded the statements of prosecution witnesses and made a search for the dead-body of the deceased Kamal. On 08.10.2005, S.I. Ashok Rangshahi arrested co-accused Sanjay, as per arrest memo (Exhibit-P/7) and appellant Mukesh, as per arrest memo (Exhibit-P/8). He recorded their memorandum statements Exhibit-P/11 and P/10 respectively and thereafter, seized a clutch wire, a broken silver chain, a pearl necklace, a leather purse containing photographs of co-accused Sanjay and deceased's wife Babita alongwith co-accused Sanjay's license and an amount of Rs.170/-cash on their instance from Gajarghas near Ralamandal Hills, Indore as per seizure memo (Exhibit-P/6). On the same day, he also seized a black coloured rubber sandal on the instance of co-accused Sanjay from a place near Talainaka, Mhow Phata as per seizure memo (Exhibit-P/5) and a nylon rope from his house as per seizure memo (Exhibit-P/4). Identification proceeding was conducted as per identification memo (Exhibit-P/10) wherein deceased's brother Ritesh identified the seized broken silver chain and pearl necklace as the articles of deceased alongwith deceased wife's photographs. Search of the body of the deceased was conducted in Narmada river near Mortakka bridge and also at Ralamandal Bawdi but the same was not found. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore who committed the

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top