High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Prakash Shrivastava, Smt. Anjuli Palo, JJ.
PRATHA RAJAK - APPELLANT
Versus
DR. HARISINGH GOUR VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ORS. - RESPONDENTS
W. P. No. 3479 of 2021
Decided On : 01-04-2021
Admission - B.A. LL.B. Course - Ordinance 44 - [SPORTS QUOTA] - [Ordinance 44] - [3.1]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought admission in B.A. LL.B. Course under the sports quota but did not meet the cut off marks for the OBC category. The petitioner claimed relaxation in the cut off marks under the sports quota, but did not fulfill the eligibility conditions prescribed in the admission brochure.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner did not fulfill the eligibility conditions for the sports quota as prescribed in the admission brochure and had participated in the selection process without raising any objection. The court held that the petitioner was estopped from challenging the conditions after the completion of the selection process.
Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's eligibility for admission under the sports quota, the impact of the amended Ordinance 44, and the principle of estoppel in challenging the selection process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle of estoppel, citing precedents, and held that the petitioner, having participated in the selection process without objection, was estopped from challenging the conditions after the process was completed.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the court held that the petitioner was not entitled to any relief at that stage.
ORDER PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, J. – By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to grant her admission in B.A. LL.B. Course for academic session 2020-2021 under the sports quota.
2. The facts in nutshell are that petitioner had applied for admission in B.A. LL.B. Course on the basis of the admission brochure of the respondent No. 1-University and had participated in the entrance test conducted All India basis on 17-10-2020. The petitioner is an OBC candidate and her name was not included in the meritlist, therefore, she has approached this Court.
3. The respondents have filed the reply stating that the petitioner had obtained marks less than the cut off marks for the OBC category and the petitioner is also not entitled to the benefit of relaxation under the sports quota, therefore, she has been deprived the admission.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in terms of the unamended Ordinance, the petitioner fulfills the requisite condition for relaxation of marks under the sports quota, therefore, she has wrongly been denied the said benefit. He further submits that the amended Ordinance has not been notified, therefore, the same has no impact.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the petition by submitting that the petitioner has no right to challenge the condition of the admission brochure because after participating in the selection process and having failed, she cannot agitate the issue now. She further submits that the selected candidates under the OBC category have not been impleaded and that the Ordinance has duly been amended and in terms thereof, the petitioner is not entitled to the relaxation in the sports quota.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record, it is noticed that the petitioner has obtained 120 marks in the entrance test whereas the cut off mark for OBC (NCL) category is 126. Since the petitioner has obtained marks less than the cut off marks, therefore, she has not been granted admission.
7. The petitioner is claiming benefit of relaxation in the cut off marks under the sports quota. In the Prospectus and Admission Brochure 2020-21, following was the condition for eligibility prescribed under the sports quota : –
“The following conditions should be fulfilled for the eligibility for seats under sports quota : – (i) The candidates should fulfill the minimum eligibility criteria for admission to the programme. (ii) The candidate should have appeared in the Entrance Test of the concerned programme and cleared the cut off marks, if any, for qualifying in the Entrance Test. (iii) The candidate must fulfill the participation rules/norms of Association of Indian Universities (AIU). (iv) The candidate should have played National (senior/junior/sub-junior/youth school/Games Federation of India) at least up to qualifying examination or should have secured a position in Zonal/Inter-Zonal/Direct All India up to 4 th position Inter-University Tournament of AIU games or have participated at these levels.
The merit of the qualified candidates for the admission under Sports Quota shall be decided by the Sports achievement marks awarded on the basis of certificates of achievements. Highest Sports achievement marks/performance of a candidate will only be considered while counting the sports achievement marks.
Sport Achievement Marks in various categories are as follows:
B-All India/Inter-Zonal Inter-University organized by AIU
C-Zonal Inter-University organized by AIU
Position
Team
Individual
Position
Team
Individual
Position
Team
Individual
1st Position
30
35
1st Position
30
35
1st Position
15
20
2nd Position
25
30
2nd Position
25
30
2nd Position
10
15
3rd Position
20
25
3rd Position
20
25
3rd Position
08
10
Vijendra Kumar Verma vs. Public Service Commission, Uttarakhand
The principle of estoppel applies to candidates who participate in a selection process without objection and cannot challenge the process after its completion.
The court established that candidates under the Sports Quota must be admitted based on their achievements, prioritizing those with higher qualifications as per the rules.
(1) Admission in Engineering Courses – Objective of introducing sports quota is not to accommodate academic merit but something altogether different: promotion of sports in institution, university, a....
The inclusion of games and their categorization for admission quota is a policy decision of the university and should not be interfered with unless completely arbitrary. Candidates cannot challenge t....
The prospectus should be interpreted to preserve the benefit of the candidate, and the substance of the candidate's achievements should be considered, especially in extraordinary circumstances such a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of judicial review in the case of selection/appointment and the requirement to adhere to the conditions stipulated in the adverti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.