VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
UPENDRASINGH S/o UJIYAR SINGH BHATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
ORDER : – The present petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India takes an exception to the order dated 6-5-2009 (Annexure P/12) by which the petitioner’s claim for the backwages has been rejected by the respondents.
2. The facts adumbrated in nutshell are that the petitioner was appointed as Sub-Inspector in police department and at the relevant time, he was posted at Special Branch, Police Headquarter, Bhopal. A criminal case No. 369/96 was registered at Police Station – Agar, Dist. Shajapur for commission of offences under sections 8/18 and 29 of N.D.P.S. Act. He was put under suspension by order dated 24-2-1997. The petitioner was convicted by the Court of Special Judge, Shajapur in Sessions Trial No. 10/1998 and was sentenced to undergo 10 years I and to pay a fine of Rupees One Lakh. Further he was convicted under section 29 of NDPS Act and was sentenced to undergo 2 years RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- under section 58(1) of NDPS Act and sentenced for six months RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and also under section 211 of Indian Penal Code, RI for 2 years and fine of Rs. 500/- by the judgment dated 4-8-1999.
3. The services of the petitioner w
Union of India and ors. vs. Mohd. Sharif Khan
Union of India vs. K. V. Jankiraman
Baldev Singh vs. Union of India
R. P. Upadhyaya vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.
Anoop Kumar Shrivastava vs. State of M. P.
Ranchhodji Chaturji Thakore vs. Gujarat Electricity Board
State of Madhya Pradesh and anr. vs. Shankar Lal Sahu and anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.