SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 663

ANAND PATHAK
ANUSHRI JAIN – Appellant
Versus
ANAMIKA JAIN – Respondent


JUDGMENT/ORDER : – Shri Nikhil Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner.

    Shri Ashish Saraswat, learned counsel for the respondents.

    With consent heard finally.

    The present civil revision under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been preferred by the petitioner, taking exception to the order dated 11-8-2021 passed by the II Civil Judge Class-II, Vidisha whereby the application preferred by the petitioner under Order VII, Rule 11 of CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE , has been rejected.

2. Brief facts giving rise to the present petition are that respondents/ plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the petitioner/defendant No. 1 in respect of the properties description of which is given in para 4 of the plaint. In the plaint, plaintiffs alleged that defendant No. 1/petitioner is daughter of first (divorced) wife of late Aseem Prakash Jain, who already received the permanent alimony of Rs. 4,50,000/- by virtue of order dated 1-3-2009 passed in F. A. No. 194/2007, therefore, defendant No. 1 has no right in the property of late Aseem Prakash Jain.

3. It is stated that plaintiff No. 1 is legally married wife of late Aseem Prakash Jain and plaintif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top