Back
J. SREENIVAS RAO
Shaik Ubaidullah – Appellant
Versus
Regiional Joint Director – Respondent
JUDGMENT
J.SREENIVAS RAO,J. - This writ petition (TR) is filed seeking the following relief:
"to grant appropriate relief declaring the Proceedings No.3709/C1/2003, dt.21/9/2012 issued by the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional apart from violating the principles of natural justice and also violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and ultra vires to Rule 20 of A.P.C.C.A. Rules, as well as Article 311 of Constitution of India and issue consequential directions directing the respondents to forthwith reinstate the applicant into service with all consequential benefits including arrears of salary and pass such other order or orders..."
2. Heard Sri Akkam Eshwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-III, appearing for respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as attender on 1/6/1990. Later, he was promoted as Record Assistant, in the year 2001. On 13/12/2003, respondent No.4 placed the petitioner under suspension, on the ground that he involved in a criminal case vide C.C.No.675 of 2005. Thereafter, the petitioner filed criminal appeal No.92 of 2008 before th
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to principles of natural justice, ensuring fair enquiry and opportunity for the accused to present their case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
