ORAL ORDER SUJOY PAUL, J. : – Heard on admission.

2. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs : –

(i) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record pertaining to impugned order of the respondent bank. (ii) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the paper publication dated 23-5-2022 published by the respondent No. 3. (iii) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be please to allow any other relief, which this Court Hon’ble Court deemed just and proper in view of aforesaid submissions. (Emphasis Supplied)

3. Shri Shekhar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned auction notice dated 23-5-2022 (Annexure P/16) is issued under section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short, ‘Securitisation Act’) read with the relevant rules.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to a query urged that petitioner doesn’t have remedy of approaching DRT by filing proceedings under section 17 of the Securitisation Act.

5. Learned counsel for the