IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rohit Arya and Avanindra Kumar Singh, JJ.
Mukesh Baretha v. State of M.P.
Criminal Appeal No. 551 of 2014 (G);
Decided on 20.10.2023*
Penal Code, 1860 -- Ss. 302, 300 Excep. 4 and 304 Pt. I -- quarrel with in-laws on sudden provocation over dispute regarding wife -- incident occurred in heat of passion -- no premeditation -- no undue advantage or action in cruel or unusual manner -- culpable homicide not amounting to murder established -- conviction u/s. 302 altered to conviction u/s. 304 Pt. I -- sentence reduced from life imprisonment to 10 years RI. (1992) 1 SCC 74 followed. [Para 15
naM lafgrk] 1860 & èkkjk 302] 300 viokn 4 rFkk 304 Òkx 1 & gR;k d¢ fy, n¨"kflf) & iRuh d¢ lacaèk esa fookn ij vpkud mn~nhiu ij llqjkyhtu ls >xM+k & ÄVuk vkos'k dh rhozrk esa ÄVh & d¨Ã iwoZfparu ugÈ & d¨Ã vlE;d~ Qk;nk vFkok Øwj ;k vlkekU; jhfr ls dk;Z ugÈ & gR;k dh d¨fV esa ugÈ vkus okyk vkijkfèkd ekuooèk LFkkfir & èkkjk 302 d¢ vèkhu n¨"kflf) èkkjk 304 Òkx 1 d¢ vèkhu n¨"kflf) esa ifjofrZr & naMkns'k vkthou dkjkokl ls ÄVkdj 10 o"kZ dk dB¨j dkjkokl fd;k x;kA ¼1992½ 1 ,l lh lh 74 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 15½
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal has been filed by appellant/accused through Jail Authorities, Central Jail, Gwalior against the judgment dated 14.2.2014 passed in Sessions Trial No.228/2013 (State of M.P. v. Mukesh Baretha) by 1st Additional Session Judge, Bhind (M.P.) by which the learned 1st Additional Session Judge has held the appellant/accused guilty for causing death of his brother-in-law/Bantu @ Suresh and injuries to his mother-in-law - Gaura Bai and brother-inlaw -Ramsiya for attempt to murder and convicted and sentenced the appellant as under:-
| Section | Acr | Sentence | Fine | Default stipulation |
| 302 | IPC | Life Imprisonment | 500/- | 3 Months RI |
| 302 (two counts) | IPC | 7 Year | 500/- | 3 Months RI |
2. In short, the prosecution story is that on 29.7.2013, complainant – Nema (PW-1) was at her home situated at Bheemnagar alongwith her mother-in-law- Gaura Bai (PW-2) wife of the deceased- Bantu @ Suresh, Sister-in-law (Devrani)- Reeta and Sister-in-law (Nanad)- Rekha (PW-3). In the afternoon of the said day, accused- Mukesh came and started abusing and asked as to why they were not sending her wife- Rekha to his home (matrimonial home) and when Bantu @ Suresh objected to the abuses, appellant took out a knife from the pocket of his pant and with an intention to kill, stabbed Bantu @ Suresh on the left side of chest and on the left thigh of Bantu @ Suresh. When relative of complainant, Ramsiya (PW-4) tried to intervene in the matter, then accused stabbed him on the left side of his chest and also stabbed near the left armpit of his mother-in-law- Gaura Bai. At the time of incident, Ramkaran (PW-7) and Banshi arrived at the spot. Thereafter, appellant ran away from the spot. Meanwhile, neighbors reached the house of the complainant and they took the injured persons to the hospital where Bantu @ Suresh was declared dead.
3. Complainant- Nema (PW-1) lodged the Dehati Nalisi Crime No.0/13 (Ex.P/1) at the hospital and FIR (Ex.P/11) bearing Crime No.359/2013 was registered at Police Station- Kotwali, District- Bhind (M.P.) by Devendra Singh – (PW-8) ASI of Police Station- Kotwali, District- Bhind (M.P.) on receiving Ex.P/1 Dehati Nalisi. Accused was apprehended and on the basis of memorandum recorded under section 27 of Evidence Act (Ex.P/8), recovery of knife was made from the possession of the appellant/accused alongwith blood stained cloths of accused, seizure memo is Ex.P/10 and seizure memo of blood stained & normal soil is Ex.P/9. After recording the statement of witnesses under section 161 of Cr.P.C. and investigating the matter, charge-sheet was filed. On being charged under sections 302 and 307 (two counts) of IPC by the learned Court, accused denied the charges and pleaded innocence and demanded trial.
4. Prosecution produced Nema (PW-1), injured mother-in-lawGaura Devi (PW-2), wife of the appellant- Rekha (PW-3), injured Ramsiya (PW-4) and Ramkaran (PW-7) as eye-witnesses, Dr. Saurabh Jain (PW-5), ASI- Shivraj Singh Chauhan (PW-6), ASI- Devendra Singh (PW-8) and Inspector- Raghvendra Singh Tomar (PW-9) who is Investigating Officer produced Dehati Nalisi (Ex.P/1), Spot map (Ex.P/2), MLC of Ramsiya (Ex.P/3), MLC of Gaura Devi (Ex.P/4), Postmortem report of Bantu @ Suresh (Ex.P/5), seizure memo of blood stained clothes of deceased & injured persons (Ex. P/6), arrest memo of the appellant (Ex.P/7), memorandum of the appellant recorded under section 27 of Evidence Act (Ex.P/8), seizure memo of blood stained & normal soil from the spot (Ex.P/9), seizure memo of Iron knife and blood stained cloths of accused (Ex.P/10), FIR (Ex.P/11), information under section 174 of Cr.P.C. (Ex.P/12), documents relating to Panchnama of dead body (Ex.P/13 & 14) and FSL report (Ex.P/15).
5. Appellant/accused in his statement under section 313 of Cr.P.C. accepted the relationship with the complainant- Nema (PW-1) but regarding criminal
Point of the court : merely on the basis of the single injury, the Court would not convert the case of Section 302 of IPC into Section 304 Part II of IPC. Nature of offence would certainly depend upo....
In cases of sudden quarrel and single injury, the nature of the injury and circumstances must be considered to determine the offense under Section 300 IPC.
The court determined that the lack of premeditated intent during a sudden quarrel warranted a conviction for culpable homicide under Section 304 instead of murder under Section 302 IPC.
The court ruled that the appellant's actions, prompted by provocation and lack of intent to kill, warranted a conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part-II IPC.
Sudden quarrel without premeditation, single stab in heat of passion without undue advantage or cruelty attracts Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC; offence reduced from Section 302 murder to Section 304....
The absence of intent to kill led to the reclassification of charges from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Conviction requires reliable evidence and knowledge of victim's medical condition; lacking such knowledge limits liability to lesser offenses.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.