SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 421

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rohit Arya and Avanindra Kumar Singh, JJ.
Mukesh Baretha v. State of M.P.
Criminal Appeal No. 551 of 2014 (G);
Decided on 20.10.2023*

Advocates:
Anoop Nigam for applicant; Smt. Dr. Anjali Gyanani, Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.

Headnote:

Penal Code, 1860 -- Ss. 302, 300 Excep. 4 and 304 Pt. I -- quarrel with in-laws on sudden provocation over dispute regarding wife -- incident occurred in heat of passion -- no premeditation -- no undue advantage or action in cruel or unusual manner -- culpable homicide not amounting to murder established -- conviction u/s. 302 altered to conviction u/s. 304 Pt. I -- sentence reduced from life imprisonment to 10 years RI. (1992) 1 SCC 74 followed. [Para 15

naM lafgrk] 1860 & èkkjk 302] 300 viokn 4 rFkk 304 Òkx 1 & gR;k d¢ fy, n¨"kflf) & iRuh d¢ lacaèk esa fookn ij vpkud mn~nhiu ij llqjkyhtu ls >xM+k & ÄVuk vkos'k dh rhozrk esa ÄVh & d¨Ã iwoZfparu ugÈ & d¨Ã vlE;d~ Qk;nk vFkok Øwj ;k vlkekU; jhfr ls dk;Z ugÈ & gR;k dh d¨fV esa ugÈ vkus okyk vkijkfèkd ekuooèk LFkkfir & èkkjk 302 d¢ vèkhu n¨"kflf) èkkjk 304 Òkx 1 d¢ vèkhu n¨"kflf) esa ifjofrZr & naMkns'k vkthou dkjkokl ls ÄVkdj 10 o"kZ dk dB¨j dkjkokl fd;k x;kA ¼1992½ 1 ,l lh lh 74 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 15½

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal has been filed by appellant/accused through Jail Authorities, Central Jail, Gwalior against the judgment dated 14.2.2014 passed in Sessions Trial No.228/2013 (State of M.P. v. Mukesh Baretha) by 1st Additional Session Judge, Bhind (M.P.) by which the learned 1st Additional Session Judge has held the appellant/accused guilty for causing death of his brother-in-law/Bantu @ Suresh and injuries to his mother-in-law - Gaura Bai and brother-inlaw -Ramsiya for attempt to murder and convicted and sentenced the appellant as under:-

Section

Acr

Sentence

Fine

Default stipulation

302

IPC

Life Imprisonment

500/-

3 Months RI

302 (two counts)

IPC

7 Year

500/-

3 Months RI

2. In short, the prosecution story is that on 29.7.2013, complainant – Nema (PW-1) was at her home situated at Bheemnagar alongwith her mother-in-law- Gaura Bai (PW-2) wife of the deceased- Bantu @ Suresh, Sister-in-law (Devrani)- Reeta and Sister-in-law (Nanad)- Rekha (PW-3). In the afternoon of the said day, accused- Mukesh came and started abusing and asked as to why they were not sending her wife- Rekha to his home (matrimonial home) and when Bantu @ Suresh objected to the abuses, appellant took out a knife from the pocket of his pant and with an intention to kill, stabbed Bantu @ Suresh on the left side of chest and on the left thigh of Bantu @ Suresh. When relative of complainant, Ramsiya (PW-4) tried to intervene in the matter, then accused stabbed him on the left side of his chest and also stabbed near the left armpit of his mother-in-law- Gaura Bai. At the time of incident, Ramkaran (PW-7) and Banshi arrived at the spot. Thereafter, appellant ran away from the spot. Meanwhile, neighbors reached the house of the complainant and they took the injured persons to the hospital where Bantu @ Suresh was declared dead.

3. Complainant- Nema (PW-1) lodged the Dehati Nalisi Crime No.0/13 (Ex.P/1) at the hospital and FIR (Ex.P/11) bearing Crime No.359/2013 was registered at Police Station- Kotwali, District- Bhind (M.P.) by Devendra Singh – (PW-8) ASI of Police Station- Kotwali, District- Bhind (M.P.) on receiving Ex.P/1 Dehati Nalisi. Accused was apprehended and on the basis of memorandum recorded under section 27 of Evidence Act (Ex.P/8), recovery of knife was made from the possession of the appellant/accused alongwith blood stained cloths of accused, seizure memo is Ex.P/10 and seizure memo of blood stained & normal soil is Ex.P/9. After recording the statement of witnesses under section 161 of Cr.P.C. and investigating the matter, charge-sheet was filed. On being charged under sections 302 and 307 (two counts) of IPC by the learned Court, accused denied the charges and pleaded innocence and demanded trial.

4. Prosecution produced Nema (PW-1), injured mother-in-lawGaura Devi (PW-2), wife of the appellant- Rekha (PW-3), injured Ramsiya (PW-4) and Ramkaran (PW-7) as eye-witnesses, Dr. Saurabh Jain (PW-5), ASI- Shivraj Singh Chauhan (PW-6), ASI- Devendra Singh (PW-8) and Inspector- Raghvendra Singh Tomar (PW-9) who is Investigating Officer produced Dehati Nalisi (Ex.P/1), Spot map (Ex.P/2), MLC of Ramsiya (Ex.P/3), MLC of Gaura Devi (Ex.P/4), Postmortem report of Bantu @ Suresh (Ex.P/5), seizure memo of blood stained clothes of deceased & injured persons (Ex. P/6), arrest memo of the appellant (Ex.P/7), memorandum of the appellant recorded under section 27 of Evidence Act (Ex.P/8), seizure memo of blood stained & normal soil from the spot (Ex.P/9), seizure memo of Iron knife and blood stained cloths of accused (Ex.P/10), FIR (Ex.P/11), information under section 174 of Cr.P.C. (Ex.P/12), documents relating to Panchnama of dead body (Ex.P/13 & 14) and FSL report (Ex.P/15).

5. Appellant/accused in his statement under section 313 of Cr.P.C. accepted the relationship with the complainant- Nema (PW-1) but regarding criminal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top