SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 388

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Ikrar – Appellant
Versus
Sharif – Respondent


Advocates:
Teju Kumar Khichi for appellant; Pradip Kumar Gupta and Bhaskar Agrawal for respondent No.3/Insurance Company.

JUDGEMENT

1. Heard finally, with the consent of the parties.

2. This miscellaneous appeal has been filed under section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award dated 1.3.2019, passed in Claim Case No.700158/2016, by 17th Member, MACT, Indore (M.P.) whereby a compensation of Rs.61,000/- has been awarded to the appellant.

3. In brief, the facts of the case are that the appellant met with an accident on 29.2.2016, at around 9:40 PM when he was dashed by a car bearing registration No.MP-09-CD-0940, which was being driven rashly and negligently by the respondent No.1, as a result of this accident, appellant Ekrar suffered various injuries on his body, including a fracture in his right leg’s tibia, fibula, and also of pubic bone. Subsequently, the appellant filed a case under section 166 (1) of Motor Vehicles Act before the Claims Tribunal claiming compensation of the injuries suffered by him, and the learned Member of the MACT, after recording the evidence has awarded a sum of Rs.61,000/- as compensation, and being aggrieved of the inadequacy of the same, present appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top