SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1170

ROHIT ARYA
Kamal Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rishikesh Bohare, Advocate, V.P.S. Tomar, Advocate

Table of Content
1. applicant's alleged illegal possession of liquor. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for and against bail application. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's reasoning for granting bail. (Para 5)
4. conditions for granting bail. (Para 6)
5. communication of court's order. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Rohit Arya, J. - This is first bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant. The applicant is in custody since 13.12.2022 in connection with Crime No.P-8/318/2022 registered at P.S. Excise Circle Chanchoda, District Guna (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 34(1) and 34(2) of EXCISE ACT .

2. As per prosecution story, present applicant was found in unauthorized and illegal possession of 55 bulk litres of illicit liquor. Accordingly, case has been registered against the applicant.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence. Applicant has suffered jail incarceration since 13.12.2022. Due to his jail incarceration, his family is in penury and on the verge of starvation. Moreso, trial is not likely to be concluded early in the near future. Under such circumstances, the prayer for grant of bail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top