SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Rohit Arya, JJ.
Kamal Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 61892 of 2022
Decided On : 29-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Rishikesh Bohare, Advocate, V.P.S. Tomar, Advocate

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - First application for bail filed on behalf of the applicant, who is in custody since 13.12.2022 for possession of illicit liquor - The defendant claimed false implication and expressed concern about family hardship and trial delays - The court noted likelihood of trial delay and granted bail with stringent conditions. (Paras 1, 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was arrested for unauthorized possession of 55 bulk litres of illicit liquor. He has been in custody since 13.12.2022, and his family is suffering from financial hardship as a result.

Findings of Court:
The court granted bail considering the duration of custody and the potential for trial delays, imposing conditions for release to ensure compliance with legal protocols.

Issues: The court addressed the merits of the bail application, citing the applicant's prolonged custody and family distress as factors necessitating the granting of bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court opined that lasting custody without quick trial proceedings warrants bail, with the stipulation of stringent conditions to ensure court presence and compliance with health directives.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Table of Content
1. applicant's alleged illegal possession of liquor. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for and against bail application. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's reasoning for granting bail. (Para 5)
4. conditions for granting bail. (Para 6)
5. communication of court's order. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Rohit Arya, J. - This is first bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant. The applicant is in custody since 13.12.2022 in connection with Crime No.P-8/318/2022 registered at P.S. Excise Circle Chanchoda, District Guna (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 34(1) and 34(2) of EXCISE ACT .

2. As per prosecution story, present applicant was found in unauthorized and illegal possession of 55 bulk litres of illicit liquor. Accordingly, case has been registered against the applicant.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence. Applicant has suffered jail incarceration since 13.12.2022. Due to his jail incarceration, his family is in penury and on the verge of starvation. Moreso, trial is not likely to be concluded early in the near future. Under such circumstances, the prayer for grant of bail may be considered on such terms and conditions as this Court deems fit and proper.

4. Per contra, learned Panel Lawyer opposes the bail application supporting the order impugned.

5. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties this Court though refrains from commenting upon the rival contentions touching the merits of the case, regard being had to the fact that the applicant is in custody since 13.12.2022, the possibility of delay in conclusion of trial cannot be ruled out. Hence, the applicant is held entitled for enlargement on bail but with stringent conditions.

6. Consequently, the application of the applicant filed under Section 439 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , 1973, is hereby allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and on the condition that he shall remain present before the Court concerned during trial and also comply with the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , 1973 with following further conditions:

    (i) the applicant shall mark his attendance before the concerned police station on 2nd and 4th Saturday every month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon;

    (ii) the applicant shall abide by the terms and conditions of various circulars and orders issued by the Government of India and the State Government as well as the local administration from time-to-time in the matter of maintaining social distancing, physical distancing, hygiene, etc., to avoid proliferation of Novel Corona virus (COVID-19);

    (iii) the concerned jail authorities are directed that before releasing the applicant, the medical examination of the applicant be conducted through the jail doctor and if it is prima facie found that he is having any symptoms of COVID-19, then the consequential follow up action or any further test required, be undertaken immediately. If not, the applicant shall be released on bail in terms of the conditions imposed in this order;

    (iv) on violation of conditions, State is free to apply for cancellation of bail;

    (v) in future, if the applicant is found to be involved in such nature of cases or any other similar criminal cases or misuse the bail granted by this Court, this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically.

7. Learned Panel Lawyer is directed to send an e-copy of this order to all the concerned including the concerned Station House Officer of the Police Station for information and necessary action.

E-certified copy as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top