SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Rohit Arya, J.
Bhupendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.3582 of 2022
Decided On : 21-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Anshu Gupta, Advocate, B.S.Gour, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

Headnote:(A) M.P. Excise Act - Sections 34(2) and 49-a - Bail application - Applicant arrested for possessing 60 liters of country-made liquor without a license - Defense claims innocence and lack of need for custodial interrogation; has been incarcerated since 8.12.2021 - Court allows bail, citing prolonged incarceration and potential trial delays due to Covid-19. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Bail Conditions - State's counsel supports the limitation on bail, citing criminal antecedents and requirement to maintain social distancing - Court imposes conditions on attendance at the police station, adherence to government directives, medical examination prior to release, and consequences for violations. (Paras 4-5)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is charged for possession of illicit liquor without a license and has faced prior criminal charges.

Findings of Court:
The applicant is entitled to bail after being in custody for over a month, with specific attendance and safety conditions outlined.

Issues: The key issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail considering prior incarceration and the potential for trial delays.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined the applicant's bail was warranted due to the lengthy custody, not requiring further custodial interrogation, along with the challenges posed by the pandemic affecting trial timelines.

Result: Bail application allowed.

JUDGMENT

Rohit arya, J. - This is second bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. The applicant has been arrested in Crime No. 494 of 2021 registered at Police Station Chachoda, District Guna for the offence punishable under Section 34 (2) and 49-a of M.P. Excise act.

as per the prosecution story, the applicant is found to be in possession of 60 bulk liters of country made liquor without having any license. accordingly, the case has been registered.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. The applicant is no more required for custodial interrogation. The applicant has already suffered incarceration since 8.12.2021. Hence, prayed for bail.

Per contra, counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer supporting the impugned order. The applicant has four criminal antecedents including the present case.

Upon hearing counsel for the parties but without touching merits of the contentions so advanced, regard being had to the fact that the applicant is in jail since 8.12.2021, the applicant is not required for custodial investigation and due to Covid-19 pandemic, the possibility of delay in conclusion of trial cannot be ruled out. Hence, the applicant is held entitled for enlargement on bail.

Consequently, the application of the applicant filed under Section 439 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , 1973 is hereby allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and on the condition that he shall remain present before the Court concerned during trial and also comply with the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE ,1973 with following further conditions:

    (i) the applicant shall mark his attendance before the concerned police station on 2nd and 4th Saturday of every month between 10:00 a.m. To 12:00 noon.

    (ii) the applicant shall abide by the terms and conditions of various circulars and orders issued by the Government of India and the State Government as well as the local administration from time-to-time in the matter of maintaining social distancing, physical distancing, hygiene, etc., to avoid proliferation of Novel Corona virus (COVID-19);

    (iii) the concerned jail authorities are directed that before releasing the applicant, the medical examination of the applicant be conducted through the jail doctor and if it is prima facie found that he is having any symptoms of COVID-19, then the consequential follow up action or any further test required, be undertaken immediately. If not, the applicant shall be released on bail in terms of the conditions imposed in this order;

    (iv) on violation of conditions, State is free to apply for cancellation of bail.

    (v) in future, if the applicant is found to be involved in such nature of cases or any other similar criminal cases or misuse the bail granted by this Court, this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically.

Learned Public Prosecutor is directed to send an e-copy of this order to all the concerned including the concerned Station House Officer of the Police Station for information and necessary action.

A copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for compliance.

CC as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top