IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J.
Narendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.21900 of 2022
Decided On : 04-05-2022
Bail - M.P. Excise Act - The court granted bail to the applicant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. considering the nature of allegations and evidence against the applicant, without commenting on the merits of the matter.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed for bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. as he was arrested for his involvement in a case related to the M.P. Excise Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without commenting on the merits of the matter, granted bail to the applicant based on the nature of allegations and evidence against him.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. considering the nature of allegations and evidence against him.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided that it was a fit case for granting bail to the applicant based on the nature of allegations and evidence against him.
Final Decision: The application for bail was allowed, and the applicant was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and complying with the provisions of Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C.
JUDGMENT
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J. - With the consent, heard finally.
Perused the case diary.
This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant, as he has been arrested on 18.04.2022 in connection with Crime No.51/2022, registered at Police Station Barod, District agar Malwa (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the M.P.Excise act.
Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 26.02.2022, co-accused Prem Singh was found having 54 bulk liters of illicit country made liquor for the purpose of sale without any valid license or authority. During investigation, it was found that co-accused Prem Singh procured/purchased the aforesaid liquor from the applicant and applicant was also involved in the crime.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per prosecution case, the applicant has been implicated only on the basis of memorandum statement of co-accused Prem Singh. Nothing has been seized from the possession of the applicant. There is no legal evidence against the applicant. He is in custody since 18.04.2022 and trial will take time for its conclusion, therefore, prayer is made to enlarge the applicant on bail.
Learned counsel for respondent/State opposes the application and prays for its rejection.
Having considered the rival submissions, nature of allegations against the applicant, also the evidence produced on record against him, without commenting anything on merits of the matter, this Court is of the considered view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. Hence, this application is allowed.
It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum o f Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before the Trial Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this behalf by the Trial Court during the pendency of trial. It is further directed that applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C.
In view of the outbreak of 'Corona Virus disease (COVID-19), the concerned Jail authority is directed to follow the directions/guidelines issued by the Government with regard to COVID-19 before releasing the applicant.
This application is allowed and stands disposed of.
Certified copy, as per Rules.
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the nature of allegations and evidence against the applicant, without commenting on the merits of the matter.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the absence of seizure from the applicant's possession and the open place of seizure, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the circumstances of the case, including the quantity of seized liquor, pending report on the nature of the liquor, and the period of custody suff....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of legal evidence to connect an accused with an alleged offence under the M.P. Excise Act, influencing the court's decision to g....
Grant of bail based on lack of legal evidence connecting the accused to the offence and the prolonged trial process.
Grant of bail based on the amount of seized liquor and period of custody, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail during trial based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, can be influenced by factors such as lack of criminal antecedents, a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.