SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 842

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Narendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhavishya Sharma, Advocate, Rahul Solanki, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Satyendra Kumar Singh, J. - With the consent, heard finally.

Perused the case diary.

This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant, as he has been arrested on 18.04.2022 in connection with Crime No.51/2022, registered at Police Station Barod, District agar Malwa (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the M.P.Excise act.

Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 26.02.2022, co-accused Prem Singh was found having 54 bulk liters of illicit country made liquor for the purpose of sale without any valid license or authority. During investigation, it was found that co-accused Prem Singh procured/purchased the aforesaid liquor from the applicant and applicant was also involved in the crime.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per prosecution case, the applicant has been implicated only on the basis of memorandum statement of co-accused Prem Singh. Nothing has been seized from the possession of the applicant. There is no legal evidence against the applicant. He is in custody since 18.04.2022 and trial will take time for its conclusion, therefore, prayer is made to enlarge the applicant on bail.

Learn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top