Back
SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Mithun – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J. - With the consent, heard finally.
Perused the case diary.
This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant, as he has been arrested on 14.01.2022 in connection with Crime No.09/2022 registered at Police Station Pipalrawan, District Dewas (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 34(2) of the M. P. Excise act, 1915.
Prosecution story, in brief is that 14.01.2022, applicant was found having and carrying 60 bulk litres of illicit county made liquor in his possession, without having any license or authority.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that nothing has been seized from the possession of the applicant. Place of seizure is an open place and applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter. applicant is in custody since 14.01.2022. Charge-sheet has been filed. Trial will take time to conclude and therefore, in the aforesaid circumstances, applicant is entitled for grant of bail.
Learned Panel Lawyer for the non-applicant - State has opposed the application and submits that applicant has criminal antecedents and about two criminal cases are registered against him but he fairly admi
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the absence of seizure from the applicant's possession and the open place of seizure, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the nature of allegations and evidence against the applicant, without commenting on the merits of the matter.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the circumstances of the case, including the quantity of seized liquor, pending report on the nature of the liquor, and the period of custody suff....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of legal evidence to connect an accused with an alleged offence under the M.P. Excise Act, influencing the court's decision to g....
Grant of bail based on the amount of seized liquor and period of custody, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the amount of liquor seized and the period of custody already undergone by the applicant, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Grant of bail based on lack of criminal past, trial being triable by lower court, and expected time for trial conclusion.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
