IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J.
Bardiram – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 61994 of 2022
Decided On : 29-12-2022
Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted bail to the applicant based on the sudden nature of the incident and the fact that the death of the deceased was caused by the co-accused persons, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed an application for bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C after being arrested for a crime registered under Sections 302, 323, and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the applicant caught hold of the complainant and assaulted him, but the death of the deceased was caused by the co-accused persons.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the application for bail, directing the applicant to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and a solvent surety, and to comply with the provisions of Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant was entitled to grant of bail despite being involved in the crime and actively participating in the assault on the complainant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the sudden nature of the incident and the fact that the death of the deceased was caused by the co-accused persons in granting bail to the applicant.
Final Decision: The application for bail was allowed and stands disposed of.
JUDGMENT
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J. - This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant, as he has been arrested on 17.10.2022 in connection with Crime No.386/2022 registered at Police Station Unhel, District Ujjain (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 302, 323 and 34 of the IPC.
2. Prosecution story, in brief is that on 16.10.2022 at about 19:30 hours complainant Ramesh was consuming liquor with Suresh at his own tea shop. In the meantime co-accused Sohan came there and started abusing complainant Ramesh and when complainant objected he twist complainant and he fell down. After hearing his screaming complainant's wife Seema and son Jitendra came there and when they took the complainant towards their house applicant reached to the spot and caught hold the complainant from back side and thereafter, his son and co-accused persons Sohan and Dharmendra press the neck of the complainant's wife Seema due to which she fell down and died.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits as per the prosecution case itself the applicant caught hold the complainant and assaulted him only. Admittedly, incident took place all of a sudden therefore, applicant cannot be held liable for the acts of the co-accused persons. Applicant is not at all responsible for the death of Seema Bai. Investigation is completed and charge sheet has been filed. Trial will take time to conclude and therefore, in the aforesaid circumstances, applicant is entitled for grant of bail.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the application and submits that the applicant is involved in the crime. He actively participated and assaulted the complainant and assisted co-accused persons in committing the offence therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail.
5. Having considered the rival submissions, nature of the allegations alleged against the applicant especially the fact that the incident took place all of a sudden and the fact that death of the deceased was caused by the co-accused persons, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.
6. It is directed that the applicant is directed to be released on bail upon his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before the Trial Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this behalf by the Trial Court during the pendency of trial. It is further directed that applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C.
7. This application is allowed and stands disposed of.
8. Certified copy, as per Rules.
The court considered the specific circumstances of the case, including the sudden nature of the incident and the extent of the applicant's involvement, in granting bail.
The court may grant bail to an applicant based on the nature of the accusation and the lack of criminal antecedents, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The importance of legal evidence and the absence of a Test Identification Parade in implicating an individual in a criminal offence.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the absence of criminal antecedents against the applicant, the lack of recovery and allegations against the applicant for causing injury to the in....
The court considered the circumstances and the relationship between the applicant and the deceased in granting bail, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Grant of bail based on lack of evidence, nature of offence, and parity with co-accused
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the circumstances of the case and completion of investigation and charge sheet filing.
The lack of identification of the accused by the complainant and injured party, along with other facts and circumstances of the case, can be considered in granting bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.