SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1370

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Laxmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SHRI VINAY GANDHI, ADVOCATE, for the Appellant; SHRI A.S. PARIHAR, PANEL LAWYER FOR STATE, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Heard finally with the consent of the counsel for the parties.

2] This petition has been filed by the petitioner, who happens to be the daughter of the deceased employee, Durga w/o. Jagdish Yadav under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against orders dated 10.12.2020, and 14.12.2020 passed by the respondent No.3 the Collector, Barwani and respondent No.4 the District Program Officer, Department of Women and Child Development, Barwani respectively. Vide order dated 10.12.2020, the petitioner's claim of Rs.50 lakhs on account of death of her mother while performing Covid-19 duties has been rejected by the respondent no.4 District Program Officer and on 14.12.2020, the respondent No.4 has also rejected the same..

3] Although in the petition, relief of compassionate appointment has also been sought, however, the State Government has already granted the aforesaid relief, so the petitioner is only claiming relief [B] which refers to grant of insurance claim of Rs.50 lakhs on account of death of her mother Durga under the State Government's Scheme known as 'Mukhyamantri Covid 19 Yodha Kalyan Yojana'.

4] In brief the facts of the case are that the mother of the petitioner Smt.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top