GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
Shivdayal Shandilya – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Today the case is fixed for consideration of I.A.No.5580/2022, an application for vacating stay.
2. The respondent No.6 has filed its return. However, the State and its functionaries have not filed their return. For adjudicating I.A.No.5580/2022, this Court is required to hear the matter on merits, therefore, instead of deciding the application, the matter is heard finally on merits.
3. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs :
a. That, in view of the fact narrated above, order issued at Annexure P/1 may kindly be quashed in the interest of justice.
b. That, due to taking illegal action by respondent no.5 the coercive step may kindly be taken against him and huge cost may kindly be imposed.
c. That any other suitable relief which this Hon'ble court deem fit in the fact of the circumstances of the case. The cost of the present petition also may kindly be awarded.
4. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the President of Vipdan Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, Sabalgarh, District Morena. The election of Board of Directors of the said society was held in the year 2020 and Directors of the So
Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. vs. CCE reported in (2015) 8 SCC 519
Haryana Financial Corporation vs. Kailash Chandra Ahuja reported in (2008) 9 SCC 31
Indu Bhushan Dwivedi vs. State of Jharkhand reported in (2010) 11 SCC 278
Natwar Singh vs. Director of Enforcement reported in (2010) 13 SCC 255
Provisions of Section 76(B(2) would stand somewhat on different footing. This Court when is taking a view that action could be initiated under subsection (2) only after passing order of removal, issu....
Legal action under S.78 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act must respect principles of natural justice, including the right to respond to specific charges.
The court held that an appeal against an interim order of suspension is not maintainable under the provisions of the relevant Act.
Proceedings for supersession of a committee under Section 32 of the KCS Act do not survive after the expiry of the term of the Managing Committee.
Compliance with statutory election procedures within cooperative societies is mandatory to ensure valid electoral processes; neglecting to notify ineligible voters invalidates election actions.
for any reason if a new committee or the management for any reason whatsoever is not elected before the expiry of the term or that such Committee having been held is not functioning, as is the case o....
The appointment of an Administrator for a cooperative society cannot extend beyond one year without elections, infringing on statutory governance mandates.
Appointment of a one man committee is only as an interim measure for convening meeting and holding election.
Disqualification of committee members requires clear show cause notices, and alternative remedies must be exhausted before seeking writ relief, affirming the importance of natural justice in administ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.