Back
GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA, RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Chaviram – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.S. Ahluwalia, J. - By this common judgment, Cr.A. No. 873 of 2011 filed by Chhaviram, Sodam @ Kunjbihari and Chunge @ Ramgopal and Cr.A. No. 977 of 2011 filed by Thakurdas and Janki @ Ramdas shall be decided.
2. It is not out of place to mention here that total 10 persons were made accused. Out of which six persons were tried in the present Sessions Trial, whereas two were juveniles and they were tried by JJB. Smt. Bhaggo Bai and Tillu were absconding. Smt. Bhaggo Bai was arrested subsequently. She has been tried separately and She too has been convicted. She has also filed Cr.A. No. 1116 of 2014. Since, the evidence in the Trial of co-accused Smt. Bhaggo bai was recorded separately, therefore, in the light of judgment passed by Supreme Court in the case of A.T. Mydeen Vs. The Asstt. Commissioner, Customs Department, reported on 31-10-2021 passed in Cr.A. No. 1306 of 2021, the evidence led in the case of present appellants cannot be read for co- accused Smt. Bhaggo bai and vice versa. However, the Appeal filed by Smt. Bhaggo Bai has also been heard simultaneously and s
The court affirmed the conviction for murder based on the established common object of the unlawful assembly, supported by credible witness testimonies and medical evidence.
The unlawful assembly's common object did not support the charge of murder; liability under Section 149 requires proof of foresight for the act committed, demonstrated through individual roles during....
The court affirmed the conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC, emphasizing the credibility of eyewitnesses and the common object of the accused in a fatal assault.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
