Back
RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Ranveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - Present criminal revision u/S. 397 r/w 401 of CrPC has been filed, challenging the order dated 06/02/2020 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Lahar, District Bhind (MP) in Sessions Trial No.09/2019, by which charges have been framed under Sections 341, 294, 148, 307, in the alternative 307/149 (five counts), 427 IPC against all the revisionists- accused except revisionist No.1-accused and charges under Sections 341, 294, 148, 307, in the alternative 307/149 (five counts), 427 IPC and Section 25(1B)(a) r/w Section 27 of the Arms Act have been framed against revisionist No.1.
2. Prosecution case, in short, is that on 24/11/2018 complainant Awadhesh lodged a Dehati Nalishi at Police Station Alampur, District Bhind alleging therein that on the date of incident i.e. 24/11/2018 at about 10:45 am, he had gone in his Scorpio vehicle along with Anirudh Pratap Singh, Ramu, Ashutosh Sharma, Kirat Singh Bhadoriya & Awdhesh Khan to Village Rurai for the purpose of public relations and when they reached near the house of Ranveer Singh (revisionist No.1), then all the accused persons obstructed the way by means of tractor.
When they told the accused persons t
The court determined that at the discharge stage, only a prima facie case is considered, and sufficient evidence of grievous injury justified framing charges under attempted murder.
The court emphasized the need to establish a prima facie case against the accused and the limitations of the court's role at the stage of framing charges. It highlighted the importance of not questio....
The court affirmed that at the charge framing stage, only a prima facie case is required, emphasizing that meticulous examination of evidence is not necessary.
At the stage of framing of the charge, the accused has no right to produce any material, and the trial court has to apply its judicial mind to the facts of the case to determine whether a case has be....
At the stage of framing charges, only prima facie evidence is required, and strong suspicion is enough to frame charges. The court referred to various legal principles and precedents to support its d....
The court ruled that at the charge framing stage, strong suspicion suffices to proceed against the accused, prioritizing witness testimonies and circumstantial evidence over the need for conclusive p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
