SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1626

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J.
Dharamnath @ Dharmnath Jogi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.8158 of 2022
Decided On : 15-02-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Rahul Bansal, Advocate, Alok Sharma, Advocate, Gaurav Mishra, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

The age of the applicant was a significant factor in the court's decision to grant bail, highlighting the consideration of individual circumstances in bail applications.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Criminal Procedure - The court allowed the bail application of an elderly applicant, aged around 71 years, who was arrested in connection with various offenses under the Indian Penal Code. The court considered the age of the applicant and directed his release on bail with certain conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant, an elderly man aged around 71 years, was arrested in connection with various offenses under the Indian Penal Code. The bail application was the first under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the bail application considering the age of the applicant, without commenting on the merits of the case, and directed his release on bail with specific conditions.

Issues: The main issue was whether the elderly applicant should be granted bail in connection with the alleged offenses under the Indian Penal Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the age of the applicant as a significant factor in allowing the bail application, without delving into the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the release of the applicant on bail with specific conditions.

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - I.a. No. 2793/2022, an application under Section 301 (2) of CrPC filed by the complainant, is taken up, considered and allowed for the reasons mentioned therein.

Shri Gaurav Mishra, advocate and his associates are permitted to appear on behalf of the complainant to assist the State counsel in the prosecution of this bail application.

This is first application under Section 439 of CrPC for grant of bail. The applicant has been arrested on 07/10/2021 in connection with Crime No.239/2021 registered at Police Station Lateri, District Vidisha for offence under Sections 294, 323, 324, 302, 506 and 34 of IPC.

It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant Dharamnath @ Dharmnath Jogi that the applicant is an old man aged around 71 years. He has not committed any offence and has falsely been implicated. He is in custody since last more than five months. allegation against the present applicant is of causing hurt by means of lathi and as per FIR, it is apparent that no grievous hurt has been caused by the present applicant, rather his name is reflected at the end of the FIR. applicant has falsely been implicated in this case as he is the father of main accused Rajnath. Hence, prayed for grant of bail to the applicant.

Per contra, learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application and have submitted that in the present case, role of the present applicant is prominent. allegation against the present applicant is of causing hurt by means of lathi and fracture was found over the body of the victim. Complainant and accused persons are neighbours, therefore, in case of grant of bail to the applicant, there is possibility that prosecution evidence will get affected. Hence, prayed to reject the bail application.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the materials available on record.

Only considering the aged of the applicant i.e. around 71 years, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is hereby directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court for his regular appearance before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

    1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

    2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

    3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

    4. The applicant shall not commit an offence of which he is accused;

    5 . The applicant will party and applicant during the trial; not move in the vicinity of complainant will not seek unnecessary adjournments

    6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

    This application stands disposed of in above terms.

    E-copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance.

    Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top