SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1650

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J.
Rajpal @ Ballu & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.7966 of 2022
Decided On : 11-02-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Daya Ram Sharm, Advocate, Dheeraj Budholia, Advocate
Final Result : Disposed Of

The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.

Headnote:

Bail - Offences under IPC - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act - The court allowed the bail application and directed the release of the applicants on certain conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The applicants filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. They were arrested in connection with offences under Sections 294, 323, 324, 336, 506, 34, 325 and 326 of the IPC.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the bail application considering the arguments of the applicants' counsel and the facts and circumstances of the case. The applicants were directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety, subject to certain conditions.

Issues: Grant of bail to the applicants, opposition by the State counsel, and compliance with bail conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the arguments and case diary, without commenting on the merits of the case, and allowed the bail application based on the facts and circumstances.

Final Decision: The applicants were granted bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety, subject to specific conditions.

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - The applicants have filed this first application u/S.439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail.

applicants have been arrested on 07/01/2022 by Police Station Pandokhar, District Datia (M.P.) in connection with Crime No.217/2021 registered for offence under Sections 294, 323, 324, 336, 506, 34, 325 and 326 of the IPC.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants, namely, Rajpal @ Ballu and Rajabhaiya @ Ravi that the applicants are innocent. They have not committed any offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. The applicants are aged around 38 years and 24 years respectively and are in custody since 07/01/2022. It is further submitted that there is previous enmity between the parties. Cross-case has also been registered against the present applicants in connection with Crime No.218/2021 in the same police station for the offence under Sections 294, 323, 336, 506 and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes act. It is further submitted co-accused- anand Dohre has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 2/2/2022 passed in M.Cr.C.No.4389/2022.

Investigation and trial will take its own time. The applicant is ready to abide by any condition which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, prayed for grant of bail to the applicants.

Per contra, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the application and prayed for rejection this application filed for grant of bail to the applicants.

Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and considered the arguments advanced by them and perused the case diary.

Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicant along-with the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is hereby directed that the applicants shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing personal bond of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned for his regular appearance before the trial Court concerned on the dates fixed by it.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicants :-

    1. The applicants will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by them;

    2. The applicants will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

    3. The applicants will not indulge themselves in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

    4. The applicants shall not commit any kind of offence. In case of commission of any kind of offence, this bail order shall automatically stand cancelled;

    5. The applicants will not move in the vicinity of complainant party and applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

    6. The applicants will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

    Application stands disposed of in above terms.

    E-copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance.

    Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top