SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1441

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Sameer @ Balli – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vivek Singh, Advocate, Pranay Joshi, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Satyendra Kumar Singh, J. - This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No.638/2021, registered at Police Station - Jivajiganj, District Ujjain (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Section 124-a, 153-a, 188, 505(2) and 34 of IPC.

Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 19.08.2021 at about 22:15 PM applicant along with other co-accused persons made anti-national slogans during Muharram procession.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that S.I. Pramod Bhadoriya in his complaint did not mention the name of the applicant. Independent witness akhilesh Sharma in his statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. has also not mentioned name of the applicant. Applicant has falsely been implicated in the matter. He is in custody since 20.08.2021. Trial will take time for its conclusion, therefore, prayer is made to enlarge the applicant on bail.

Learned counsel for respondent/State opposed the application and submitted that in the video clipping of the incident applicant was identified as one of the accused in the crime. Offences alleged against him are serious in nat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top