SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 757

SUNITA YADAV
Deepak Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Saroj Bala Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.K. Gupta, Advocate, Rashi Kushwah, Advocate, K.S. Tomar, Advocate, J.S. Kaurav, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Present first appeal under Sec. 96 of C.P.C. has been filed against the judgment and decree dtd. 27/8/1998 passed by Fifth Additional District Judge Gwalior, District Gwalior (M.P.) in Civil Suit No.13A/1994 whereby, the civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff for declaration, partition and permanent injunction has been decreed.

2. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the respondent no.1 will be referred to as the plaintiff, respondent no.2- as defendant no.1 and respondents no. 3 to 14 as defendants no.2 to 13.

3. The relevant facts to decide the appeal are that the plaintiff filed a suit for declaration, partition and permanent injunction in respect to suit house bearing no.25/433 situated at Loko-shed, Tansen Road, Gwalior (M.P.) against the appellant, and other defendants on the allegations. It is alleged in the plaint that deceased Shyamlal was the owner of the suit house. Deceased Shyamlal's daughters are plaintiff and defendant no.1. Shyamlal died on 30/10/1993, therefore, plaintiff- Smt. Sarojbala Tiwari and defendant no.1- Sushila Sharma being the daughter of deceased became successors. Plaintiff - Smt. Sarojbala Tiwari and defendant no.1- Sushila Shar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top