Back
NANDITA DUBEY
Vijay Patel @ Brijendra Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Nandita Dubey, J. - This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail.
2. The applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.98/2023 registered at Police Station Kareli, District Narsinghpur for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 377, 34 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. As per the prosecution, the applicant is the elder brother-in-law of the complainant who has lodged the complaint stating that she got married on 14.06.2022 and from the very next day, her husband and the rest of the family members started demanding a car from her parents and she has made allegation against the applicant that he used to unnatural act with her.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that apart from the omnibus allegation that all the family members were demanding a car from the parents of the complainant, no other allegation has been made against him. It is pointed out that specific allegation is against the husband of the complainant. It is stated that the trial Court has refused his bail application only for the reason that his younger brother, i.e., husband of the complainant is abs
The court considered the omnibus nature of the allegations and absence of specific allegations against the applicant in granting anticipatory bail.
The court may grant anticipatory bail based on the nature of allegations and the circumstances of the case, including the status of co-accused.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of discretion in granting anticipatory bail based on the specific allegations and individual circumstances of the petitioners.
Entitlement to anticipatory bail based on specific allegations of harassment and illegal demands.
Anticipatory bail can be granted if there are no specific allegations against the applicant, ensuring the right to a fair trial and evidentiary support for accusations.
Anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 when allegations do not warrant preemptive detention, provided conditions to protect ongoing investigations are set.
It does not lay down that the anticipatory bail has to be given, irrespective of the role attributable to an accused in the commission of the offence.
Anticipatory bail can be granted in serious allegations, balancing the gravity of charges with the rights of the accused under specific conditions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
