VIVEK AGARWAL
Tulsa Bai Gond W/O Shri Ramnarayan Gond – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh Secretary Women And Child Development Deptt. (Madhya Pradesh) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This petition is filed being aggrieved of selection of respondent No.6 on the post of Anganwadi Karyakarta and the appeal which was filed before respondent No.2 Commissioner, Sagar Division, Sagar as was registered as Appeal No.269/A-89/2009-10 on 30.11.2013 rejected the petitioner's appeal, hence this writ petition.
2. On 21.04.2022, this Court had allowed the writ petition but the respondent No.6 herein had approached the Division Bench of this Court by filing W.A. No.533/2022 taking a ground that she was not given an opportunity of hearing and, therefore, Hon'ble Division Bench was pleased to remand the matter to the Single Bench. Hence this matter is taken up today.
3. Issue involved herein is that whether the respondent No.6 whose husband was admittedly a Panch at the time of her making an application for appointment as Anganwadi Karyakarta at Anganwadi Kendra, Chopra, Gram Panchayat Sakariya, District Panna was whether eligible for such appointment in terms of the stipulations contained in Office Memorandum No./F3-2/06/50-2 dated 27.05.2006 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh Women and Child Development Department, Mantralay.
4. Petitioner's contention is that as per
Arun Kumar Agrawal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Draupathi Tiwari Vs. State of M.P. and others
Girnar Traders v. State of Maharashtra
Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Ishwar Singh Bindra Vs. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.