Back
RAVI MALIMATH, VISHAL MISHRA
Sanjay Anant Godbole – Appellant
Versus
Madhya Pradesh Generating Company Limited. – Respondent
ORDER
1. Assailing the order dated 25.10.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in dismissing Writ Petition No.10997 of 2017, the writ petitioner is in appeal.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a diploma holder in Mechanical Engineering and entered into service of the respondent-department on 12.12.1980 as a diploma trainee in erstwhile M.P. State Electricity Board (MPSEB). He was given regular appointment on the post of Junior Engineer w.e.f. 12.3.1982. He completed AMIE which is equivalent to Bachelor Degree in Engineering and he was selected being a departmental candidate as a graduate trainee by order dated 24.7.1990. By order dated 16.5.1991, he was appointed as Assistant Engineer. Thereafter, he was promoted to the post of Executive Engineer and he is still working as Executive Engineer but is getting the pay scale of Superintending Engineer under the scheme of Higher Pay Scale. The M.P. Electricity Board has bifurcated the companies and under the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, there is protection given to the employees of successive companies that after their services were allocated to the successive companies, their service conditions which were appl
Denial of advance increments based on alleged lack of prior approval violates principles of fairness; similarly circumstanced individuals were granted benefits, constituting discrimination under Arti....
Rejection of claim for advancement increments based on improper grounds; adherence to stipulated eligibility rules in administrative decisions is crucial.
Appellants denied advance increments as the M.Tech qualification became a basic requirement post-implementation of new regulations; advancements in qualification do not entitle retroactive benefits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to the benefit of financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme, based on the scheme guidelines and the lack of further ....
The impugned order's ground for rejection was not sustainable in the eyes of law, and the decision of the Board of Coal India Limited did not make any distinction amongst the diploma holders for two ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
