SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 922

MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
Vimla Jat (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S. Yadav for petitioner; S. S. Kushwah, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been directed against a notice dated 17.10.2023 issued by Collector, Sheopur, whereby invoking the provisions under section 50 of the MPLRC of suo-moto revision, the present petitioner has been called upon to make submissions with regard to the illegal mutation of his name done on the land bearing survey Nos.884/11 and 884/18 admeasuring 2.090 and 1.045 hectare respectively on the basis of some sale-deed in the proceedings before Tehsildar No.50/2012-13/A-6 dated 20.5.2013.

2. The said notice issued by invoking the provisions of section 50 of the MPLRC had been assailed on the ground that the very notice has been issued with an ill motive under some political pressure of the ruling party and has been issued without following the due procedure of law. It was submitted that in wake of the aforesaid notice the respondents are trying to forcibly evict/disposses the petitioner from the land in question and are bent upon to delete the entries in the revenue records of the name of the petitioner, which has rightly been mutated in the revenue records. It was further submitted that the said issuance of notice wo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top