SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 208

ANAND PATHAK
Uday Shivhare – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sameer Kumar Shrivastava for applicants;
Rajeev Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioners under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashment of FIR dated 6.5.2023 registered at Crime No.247/2023 at Police Station Thatipur, District Gwalior for the offence under sections 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act, 1915 read with section 109 of IPC.

2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that on 6.5.2023, respondent No.1 lodged an FIR that during flag march, an information was received by the Police Station that some persons are illegally selling liquor from the shop which is otherwise closed. It is alleged that certain officers of respondent No.1 went to the spot and found that petitioner No.2 was selling liquor from the shop alleged to be closed. When police directed petitioner No.2 to produce licence, it was informed by petitioner No.2 that there is no licence for the alleged shop, then police seized 27 boxes of Masala Country liquor and 36 boxes of plan country liquor along with cash of Rs.25,100/-. On interrogation, petitioner No.2 referred the name of petitioner No.1 from him he procured the liquor and therefore, petitioner No.1 was also arrayed as accused in the case purportedly under sec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top