SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 119

PREM NARAYAN SINGH
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Jafar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sachin Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer for petitioner/State.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision under section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred by State of M.P. being aggrieved by the order dated 257.05.2023 passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Khargone, District Mandleshwar in Criminal Revision No. 02/2023, whereby the seeking interim custody of Bolero pick up bearing registration No. MP-10-G-3380 has been handed over to the respondent on supurdginama.

2. Counsel for the State submitted that the learned trial Court has committed grave error of law by handing over the vehicle to the respondent on supurdginama, without considering the fact that confiscation proceedings were already commenced under the M.P. Excise Act 1915 (hereinafter referred as..."the Act "). It is further submitted that a letter dated 14.11.2022 already been written from the Office of Superintendent of Police Khargone, to Collector Khargone regarding initiation of confiscation proceedings. Hence counsel prays for setting aside the impugned order.

3. I have heard the contention of counsel for the State and perused the record.

4. From the face of record, it is clearly apparent that the aforesaid letter dated 14.11.2022 written from th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top