SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 217

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Karansingh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Bharat Yadav for Petitioner; Vinod Thakur, Government Advocate, for respondent No.1/State. Manoj Kumar Sahani for respondent No. 2.

ORDER

1. The present petition is filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, being aggrieved by the order dated 1/3/2023 passed by the Ist ASJ, Rajgarh, District - Rajgarh(M.P.) in Criminal Revision No.21/2023 arising out of the order dated 2/2/2023 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Rajgarh in criminal case No.174/2023 arising out of crime No. 17/2023 registered at P.S. - Biaora Dehat, District - Rajgarh (M.P.) whereby the Courts below rejected the application filed by the petitioner under section 451 of Cr.P.C for interim custody of the vehicle No. MP-45-H-0341.

2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner is a registered owner of mini truck bearing registration No.MP-45-H-0341. The petitioner entered into an agreement on 10.10.2022 for rent of the aforesaid vehicle to the respondent No. 2 namely Bhaskar Hihor and against whom the aforesaid case is registered by the respondent No.1. On secret information received on 18.1.2023, the respondent No. 2 was arrested by the respondent No. 1 and it is alleged that the respondent No. 2 was carrying 725.76 bulk litre of foreign liquor in the said vehicle without possessing any valid permit/license. The vehicle was seized on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top