SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 137

GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
Commissioner M. P. Housing Board – Appellant
Versus
Haricharan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Kapil Duggal for petitioners; Swapnil Khare for respondent.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs :-

(i) Call for the records of the case.

(ii) Set-aside the impugned award dated 9.1.2020 passed by the learned Labour Court, Bhopal in New Case No.108/18 I.D. Ref (Old Case No.39/03 I.D. Ref.)

(iii) Any other appropriate writ/order/direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper also kindly be issued in the interest of justice.

2. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioners that Labour Court has setaside the order of termination on the ground that since retrenchment compensation was paid through cheque and not in cash, therefore, there was no substantial compliance in the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme court in the case of Anoop Sharma v. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1, Panipat (Haryana) reported in (2010) 5 SCC 497.

3. Challenging the aforesaid order, it is submitted by counsel for the petitioners that it is an undisputed fact that along with an order of termination, cheque of one month salary along with compensation was given to the workman and that aspect has also been admitted by him in cross-examination. The fact

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top