Back
ANAND PATHAK
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Pichhore – Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Kumar Bhatt – Respondent
ORDER
1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is preferred by the petitioner being crestfallen by the award dated 24.3.2018 (pronounced on 2.5.2018) passed by the Labour Court No.2, Gwalior in case No.02/A/I.D. Act/2015 (Reference) whereby the respondent has been directed to be reinstated with 50% back wages.
2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that petitioners and respondent were having workman employer relationship and the respondent was appointed as daily rated Nakedar on Collector rate in the establishment of petitioner No.1 Samiti. The dates and events having material bearing over the case and necessary for disposal of the case are as under:
| S. No. | Date | Event |
| 1 | 1.10.92 | Respondent was appointed in the establishment of petitioner No. 1 - Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Pichhore District Shivpuri as daily rated Nakendar on Collector Rate. |
| 2 | 13.11.94 | Respondent/employee was orally removed from the services by petitioner No. 1 as there was no necessity of his services. |
| 3 | 2009 | Respondent started conciliation proceedings before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Gwalior but it fail |
Daily wage worker - Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen - Quantum of compensation - Termination of service of employee by way of retrenchment without complying with requirement of giving ....
there is a breach of Section 25-F of the I.D. Act and as there is a delay of 11 years in preferring the reference, instead of granting reinstatement a lump sum amount as full and final settlement wil....
In a case where Section 25-F of the Act applies the workman is bound to prove that he had been in continuous service of 240 days during twelve months preceding the order of termination; in a case whe....
Violation of provisions under Sections 25F and 25H of the ID Act led to the direction for reinstatement without backwages.
Non-compliance with mandatory Section 25-F(c) notice to appropriate Government renders retrenchment illegal, vitiating termination despite other conditions met.
Section 10 reads as reference of disputes to Boards, Courts or Tribunals.
The main legal point established is that even temporary employees can be considered 'workmen' under the Industrial Disputes Act, and termination without complying with Section 25(F) may entitle the e....
Termination of casual workers constituted illegal retrenchment under Section 25F due to failure to provide notice and compensation; reinstatement replaced with monetary compensation due to the delay ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
