SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 215

HIRDESH
Pushpa Patel – Appellant
Versus
Neelima Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Verma for applicants; Pramod Kumar Gautam, Panel Lawyer for respondent No. 2/State. .

ORDER

1. This civil revision u/s 115 of CPC has been filed by the applicants being aggrieved by order dated 9.5.2022 passed by 14th Civil Judge Class-II, Jabalpur in Regular Civil Suit No.175-A/2022, in which, the trial Court has rejected the application of the applicants filed under Order 7 rule 11 CPC.

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent No.1/plaintiff has instituted a suit against applicants/defendant No.1 to 6 before the trial Court seeking decree of permanent injunction by pleading that on 21.2.2021 the respondent/plaintiff entered into an agreement with Late Lakhanlal Patel s/o Late Khitai r/o House No.19, Vivekananda Ward, Badhoraha Tola, Badi Ukhari, Jabalpur for purchase of 35,000 sq.ft. (out of total 0.860 hectares) of agricultural land at the rate of Rs.490/- per sq.ft. for a total sale consideration of Rs.1,71,50,000/- bearing ‘Rin Pustika’ No.835-000550 and Khasra No.56/6 situated at Laxmipur, Settlement No.643, Patwari Halka No.25/31, R.I.Circle, Jabalpur-I, Old Tahsil Jabalpur, New Tahsil Adhartal, District Jabalpur. The plaintiff further pleaded that Late Lakhanlal Patel handed over possession of the suit land. At present the suit land bears Khasra No.56/6/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top