SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 1002

DWARKA DHISH BANSAL
Rajdhar S/o. Tilakdhari – Appellant
Versus
Dhokiya W/o. Ramgopal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Sanjana Sahni.
For the Respondent: Nityanand Mishra.

ORDER :

Dwarka Dhish Bansal, J.

This civil revision has been preferred by the applicants/judgment debtors 1-2 challenging the order dated 29-10-2015 passed by 1st Civil Judge Class-II, Sirmour, District Rewa in Execution Case No. 66-A/2006 whereby applicants/judgment debtors 1-2’s objection/application under Order 21, Rule 23(2) CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE for dismissal of execution proceedings as barred by limitation, has been dismissed.

2. Short facts of the case are that in the civil suit filed for declaration of title/share(s), partition and separate possession as well as for mesne profits, 1st Civil Judge Class II, Rewa in Civil Suit No. 66-A/74 passed judgment and decree on 31-3-1979, which was affirmed by District Judge, Rewa vide judgment and decree dated 27-8-1982 and finally the matter was decided on 1-2-1988 by High Court in SA No. 584/1982. Relevant paragraph 8 and 9 of the judgment passed in second appeal, are quoted as under :—

    “8. To sum up, the factual position emerging from the discussion aforesaid is that the respondent is entitled to 1/10th share in the agricultural lands mentioned in ‘Scheduled-A’ of the plaint. Since this land is only 23.75 acres, her share would work o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top