SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 301

PRANAY VERMA
RADHESHYAM – Appellant
Versus
GOTULAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioner: Sunil Yadav.

ORDER :

(Pranay Verma, J.) :

This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 28.08.2023 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Ujjain Division, Ujjain reversing the order dated 31-12-2020 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Sub Division Javad, District - Neemuch who in turn had set aside the order dated 17-12-2019 passed by the Tehsildar, Tehsil Javad, whereby the application under section 250 of the M. P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 (for short ‘the Code’) preferred by respondent No. 1 had been allowed.

2. The facts in brief are that respondent No. 1 made an application before the Tehsildar for demarcation of his land bearing survey No. 853 area 0.470 hectare and survey No. 854 area 0.200 hectare total area 0.670 hectare, Gram Babaljuni, Tehsil Javad, District – Neemuch. On the application demarcation was carried out on 25-6-2018. There was some error in demarcation which was corrected by order dated 16-7-2018. In the demarcation illegal possession of the petitioner over the disputed land was found. Respondent No. 1 then requested the petitioner to deliver possession of the said land to him b

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top