SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 1005

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
G. S. Enterprises, Indore – Appellant
Versus
Yogesh Agrawal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Yogesh Mittal
For the Respondent: Vinay Saraf, Rizwan Khan

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction of real estate appellate tribunal. (Para 2 , 3)
2. factual basis of the appeal. (Para 6 , 7)
3. arguments on the appellate tribunal's constitution. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. implications of tribunal's composition on judgments. (Para 24 , 25 , 31)
5. outcome of the appeal and further proceedings. (Para 32 , 34)

JUDGMENT :

Heard finally, with the consent of the parties.

2. This civil second appeal has been filed under section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (in short ‘the Act of 2016’) and under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment dated 7-6-2021, passed by Member, Madhya Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal at Bhopal in Appeal No. A-135/2019, thereby reversing the order dated 10-6-2019, passed by the M.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority (in short, RERA) in Case No. M-IND-17-0761 of 2017.

3. This appeal was admitted by this Court vide order dated 5-10-2021, on the following substantial question of law :—

    “1) Whether the impugned judgment can be sustained in the eyes of law, as it has been passed by one Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal, despite the fact that, as per section 45 of the M.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top