SANJEEV SACHDEVA, VINAY SARAF
Lalit Chaturvedi (Dr. ) – Appellant
Versus
Dipali Sahu – Respondent
ORDER
Sachdeva, J. -- 1. Appellant impugns orders dated 30.4.2024 and 1.10.2021, whereby in an execution proceeding, employer of the appellant has been directed to furnish the income details of appellant to respondent.
2. Respondent had filed the subject execution seeking execution of the order of maintenance dated 4.3.2017 assessing interim maintenance under section 36 of the SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT , 1954 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") @ 6,000/- per month.
3. Contention of learned counsel for appellant is that the order passed under section 36 of the Act is not executable in terms of section 39A of the Act. He further submits that a sum of Rs.48,000/- has been deposited in the proceeding under the Domestic Violence Act and a sum of Rs.2,90,000/- was paid in cash to the respondent and she had not claimed adjustment on either of the said amount.
4. Appellant and respondent were married but on account of certain disputes they separated and have been living separately since February, 2016. Appellant filed a proceeding for divorce under the Act, in which, by order dated 4.3.2017 interim maintenance @ 6,000/- per month was fixed by the Court in exercise of powers under section 36
An interim maintenance order under Section 36 of the Special Marriage Act remains enforceable despite the dismissal of a divorce petition, as it is connected to proceedings in Chapters V and VI.
A Divorce Petition can be maintainable under Section 13(1A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act even after a prior dismissal if new grounds exist due to non-resumption of cohabitation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an application under Section 26 of the DV Act for maintenance is an independent remedy and should be decided on its merits, taking into accoun....
Judicial Magistrates have the authority to issue non-bailable warrants for recovery of maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act, and enforcement procedures can follow the Criminal Procedure Code.
A husband's imprisonment for non-payment does not absolve his obligation to pay maintenance; ongoing enforcement is essential to protect the recipient's welfare.
Maintenance orders can be executed in jurisdictions based on temporary residence, affirming a spouse's right to choose the execution venue under the Code's provisions.
Matrimonial proceedings cannot be dismissed for non-compliance with interim maintenance orders; timely enforcement of maintenance is crucial for fair adjudication.
Point of law: Enforcement of the order of maintenance is provided under Section 128 of Cr.P.C., giving option to the wife to seek enforcement either in a place where the order was passed or in a plac....
Courts can grant maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act while other maintenance orders exist; proper assessment of the husband's income is essential for determining just....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.