SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 478

G. S. AHLUWALIA
Gurpreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Shikha Bhatnagar – Respondent


Advocates:
Surendra Verma for petitioner;
Paritosh Gupta for respondent.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been order dated 7.8.2024 passed by 16th Additional Judge to Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jabalpur in RCSA No. 32/2024.

2. An application was filed by petitioner expressinapprehension that landlord/respondent may get the electricity connectherefore, it was prayed that M.P. Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. may be restrained from disconnecting the By the impugned order, the said application was rejected on the ground that such power is with the RCA.

3. Challenging the order passed by the Court below, it is submitted by counsel for petitioner that section 38 of M.P. Accommodation would come into picture only if the essential services are withheld or cut off by the landlord. The application was filed before the trial Court under an apprehension that landlord may get the electricity connection disconnected and therefore, the trial Court has a jurisdiction to pass an order of temporary injunction.

4. Per contra, petition is vehemently opposed by counsel for respondent. It is submitted that respondent is a widow lady and petitioner is occupying her property without making payment of rent. Even he has shifted his pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top