SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 501

ANIL VERMA
Rampuri Thr. LRs. Mahendrapuri – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ramlal Patidar with Vishal Patidar for appellants;
Amit Raval, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Appellants / plaintiffs have preferred this second apppeal under section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred as “CPC”) being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree dated 8.12.2000 passed by the Third Additional District Judge, Mandsaur in First Appeal No.25-A/2000, affirming the judgment and decree dated 3.11.1998 passed by the Civil Judge Class-II Narayangarh in Civil Suit No.401-A/1997, whereby the suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction filed by the appellants has been dismissed.

2. Facts of the case in brief are that the appellants / plaintiffs have filed a civil suit before the trial Court for declaration of title and permanent injunction in regard of the suit land situated at Village Kitukhedi, Tehsil Malhargarh, District Mandsaur (M.P.) bearing survey Nos.22/1-73, 104/7-10, 21/1-15, 13/2-26, 12/2-26, 94/0-90 having total area ad-measuring 6.228 hectare. The suit land was allotted by the erstwhile Holkar State as an Inam in the year 1931 and the appellants' forefathers performed Puja and Archana in the temple of the Nilkantheshwar Mahadev situated at Village Kitukhedi. After the death of father of the appellants, appellants

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top