SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 115

ANAND PATHAK
Ramkrishna Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K. Gupta with Santosh Agrawal for appellant; Vijay Sundaram, Penal Lawyer for respondent/State.

JUDGMENT

1. Instant appeal under section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2001 passed by the XII Additional District Judge, Gwalior in Civil Suit No.30-A/2001 whereby the suit preferred by the appellant/plaintiff has been dismissed.

2. Facts in brief for adjudication are that suit for declaration and permanent injunction was filed by the appellant as plaintiff against the respondents/defendants with the pleadings that property by way of house situate at house No.39/720 Jiwaji Chowk, Bada Lashkar District Gwalior is his ancestral property in which deities Shri Hanuman Ji, Shri Ram Janki Ji and Shri Mahadev Ji were installed and anointed by his ancestors. House was constructed around 200 years back and thereafter these deities were established by his ancestors while bringing the statues from Rajasthan. This temple is their personal temple and since inception they are taking care of the temple and whole management of the temple is being undertaken by the plaintiff. Prior to him, his ancestors were managing the temple by their own funds and time to time constructions of different nature were raised by the plaintiff an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top