GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
Gyan Singh Parmar S/o Shri S S Parmar – Appellant
Versus
Employee State Insurance Corporation Through The Regional Director Nanda Nagar Indore (Madhya Pradesh) – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following relief(s) :-
(ii) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent authorities to reconsider the entire matter after affording the opportunity of hearing and the submissions put forthwith by the petitioner and pass speaking order.
(iii) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the appeal after condoning the delay in filing the appeal and direction may be issued to the appellate authorities to consider the appeal preferred by the petitioner.
(iv) Any other order/orders, direction/directions which deems fit and proper may also be passed.
(v) Award cost of the litigation to the petitioner.
2. It is submitted by Counsel for the Petitioner that by order dated 21-11-2022 passed under Section 45A of the Employees State Insurance Act (In short Act), the authorities had assessed the liability of the Petitioner to the tune of Rs. 7,95,218 towards default contribution. Thereafter, another order dated 26-4-
The Limitation Act does not apply to quasi-judicial bodies, and the Appellate Authority cannot condone delay in the absence of specific provisions under the Employees State Insurance Act.
The court ruled that under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013, appeals must be filed within 120 days, and the court has no power to condone delays beyond th....
The court ruled that under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013, appeals must be filed within 120 days, and the court has no power to condone delays beyond th....
The court ruled that strict compliance with statutory time limits is mandatory, and substantial justice cannot override clear legislative provisions regarding delay in filing appeals.
A formal application for condonation of delay is not necessary; oral requests sufficing with sufficient cause are valid in proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act.
The Central Government cannot entertain a revision petition filed beyond the statutory six-month limit, regardless of claimed health reasons, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to limitation p....
A formal application for condonation of delay under the Limitation Act is not mandatory if sufficient cause is shown, allowing courts to exercise discretion in restoring cases.
The law of limitation is strict and must be adhered to; bureaucratic delays are not sufficient grounds for condoning delays in filing appeals.
(1) Limitation – Condonation of delay – Phrase “within such period” signifies that period covered therein extends to not only original period within which, appeal or application, should have been fil....
The law of limitation is to be strictly enforced, and parties, including the government, must provide sufficient cause for any delay in filing appeals; negligence or lack of bona fides will not justi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.