Vikas vs Nirmala Sharma - 2024 Supreme(MP) 655

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(MP) 655

GAJENDRA SINGH
Vikas – Appellant
Versus
Nirmala Sharma – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri Jagdish Baheti
For the Respondent: Shri J.B. Mehta

ORDER :

This revision petition under section 115 of the CPC is preferred under section 23-E of the M.P Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act of 1961') being aggrieved by the order dated 06.12.2024 (Annexure P/1) in case no.0013/A-90 (7) 2022-23 by Rent Controlling Authority (for short 'the RCA'), Juni Indore whereby defence of the petitioners/tenants has been struck off under section 13(6) of the Act of 1961.

2. Facts in brief are that respondent/landlord filed an application (Annexure A/2) under section 23 of the Act of 1961 before the Rent Controlling Authority, Juni Indore for eviction of the tenants/petitioners on the ground of bona fide requirement of the suit accommodation let out for residential purposes.

3. The application was replied through Annexure P/3.

4. Landlord/respondent filed an application (Annexure P/4) under section 13(6) of the Act of 1961 to stike out the defence of the petitioners/tenants. The application was replied and also filed an application to condone the delay in depositing the rent (Annexure P/5). Annexure P/5 was opposed through reply available at page no.64 to 70 and the Rent Controlling Authority struck out the defence and fixed the case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document