HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN, J.
Smt. Anita Mathur, W/o. Shri Bhvanesh Mathur – Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, represented through Public Prosecutor – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 9538 of 2022
Decided On : 03-12-2025
Order :
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN, J.
1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), seeking the quashing of First Information Report (FIR) No.312/2021. This FIR was registered at Police Station, Bhatta Basti, District Jaipur City (North), for offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ).
2. The brief facts of the case are that the aforesaid FIR was lodged on 11.10.2021, on the complaint submitted by Smt. Neeta Mathur who is respondent No. 2 in this petition. It is stated by the complainant in her complaint that herself, her husband Shri Sunil Mathur, and her son Yash Mathur were residing in House No.4 D- 22 Housing Board, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. She further mentioned that her sister-in-law, Smt. Anita Mathur, had visited Jaipur for the last rites of the complainant’s father-in-law. It is alleged that, shortly before the death, Smt. Anita Mathur took advantage of her father-in-law's ill health to prepare a forged and fabricated Will concerning the house and multiple bank accounts. It is also alleged that this Will was subsequently utilized to file a civil suit aimed at usurping ornaments kept in a bank locker and the residential property. The FIR also specifies that Smt. Anita Mathur had filed several false complaints in the police station with intention to get them evicted from the aforementioned house. It is also alleged in the complaint that when the complainant’s son, Yash Mathur, was selected for the Indian Air Force, Smt. Anita Mathur filed a false complaint against him, allegedly to pressurize the family. Due to this very reason, his son was unable to complete his police verification, thereby stressing about his future, and consequently slid into depression. The FIR finally alleges that, despite counseling from friends, relatives, neighbours, and his father, the son frustrated by the continuous complaints filed against him, committed suicide on 10.10.2021, between approximately 5:00-5:30PM.
3. Before moving on, it is also pertinent to take note that the complainant-respondent No.2 in her reply to this petition has also brought the notice of this Court to a suicide note left by the deceased and same is being reproduced as under:-
“I am Quitting because I am tired from my life since childhood. I have always seen my parents fighting on Different issues which makes me weak from inside But there love for me bring me energy too. Since 2013 After my Grandfather's death everything become Worst. My Aunty (Bhua) make our life like hell Since then everything became worse. She filed fake case & police complains to tease us. She passes out many negative comments at many moment This all make my mother mentally ill. She got an Brain Hamarage because of this shit. My Parents became fustrated & After Corona Our Economic Condition also get very low. So these circumstances forced me to do this Action. I am sorry mumma... I Love You
Yash Mathur"
4. Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that bare perusal of the FIR would reveal that no case under Section 306 of IPC is made out against the petitioners. Learned senior counsel argues that the suicide note, if taken at face value would further reveal that there is no direct nexus between the incident and the alleged harassment by petitioner No.1. Learned senior counsel averred that a civil dispute is going on between the parties and such a civil suit and a complaint to the SHO cannot possibly be considered harassment as the petitioner is exercising the legal remedies available to her. Learned senior counsel finally contended that due to reasons such as huge gap between the complaints against the deceased and the deceased committing suicide, coupled with several other problems the deceased had already been going through, it cannot be said that the petitioners in any way induced or abetted the deceased to commit suicide.
5. In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the petitio
Patel Babubhai Manohardas and Ors. V. State of Gujarat
Mahendra Awase V. State of M.P
Naresh Kumar V. State of Haryana
Mohit Singhal and Anr. V. State of Uttarakhand
Geo Varghese V. State of Rajasthan and Anr.
M. Arjunan V. State Rep by Its Inspector of Police
Sanju alias Sanjay Singh Sengar V. State of M.P.
Mahendra Awase Vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Mohit Singhal Vs The State of Uttarakhand
For abetment of suicide under IPC Section 306, clear and proximate evidence of instigation or aid from the accused is essential; mere allegations in a civil dispute are insufficient.
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or intent; mere allegations linked to civil disputes do not meet this threshold.
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or intent to drive the deceased to suicide; mere harassment is insufficient.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a proximate and live link between alleged instigation or illegal acts and the subsequent suicide, the absence of mens rea and po....
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or direct causation linked to the act of suicide, which was not present in this case.
The judgment emphasizes the requirement of a proximate link between the alleged acts of the accused and the suicide by the deceased, as well as the need for clear mens rea to commit the offence under....
Denial of marriage does not constitute abetment of suicide under IPC without clear evidence of instigation or aiding the act.
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear instigation or intentional aid; mere suspicion or threats are insufficient.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of mens rea and direct or active instigation for the offence of abetment under Section 306 of the IPC. The judgment also emphasizes....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of an active role and instigation in abetment to suicide, as well as the need to consider the mental state and circumstances of the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.