SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2346

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN, J.
Smt. Anita Mathur, W/o. Shri Bhvanesh Mathur – Petitioner 
Versus
State of Rajasthan, represented through Public Prosecutor – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 9538 of 2022 
Decided On : 03-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv. assisted by Ms. Savita Nathawat, Mr. Prateek Mathur & Ms. Kritika Singh Mr. Sanjeev Johri, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Shubhankar Joshi
For the Respondent: Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP
For the Complainant : Mr. Rajesh Sharma

To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or intent; mere allegations linked to civil disputes do not meet this threshold.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code - Section 306 - Quashing of FIR - Allegations of abetment of suicide not substantiated as no direct connection established between actions of petitioner and suicide - A gap of three months between complaints and suicide undermines claim of instigation - Court emphasizes the need for clear, proximate acts of abetment with intent to drive victim to suicide - Proceedings quashed as abusive of process. (Paras 1, 3, 8-22)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused in an FIR alleging she forged a will and harassed the complainant's son leading to his suicide. The son left a note citing multiple family issues and stress.

Findings of Court:
The Court found no evidence of instigation under Section 306 IPC, noting the gap between disputes and suicide and highlighting the deceased's various personal problems.

Issues: Whether the actions of the petitioner could be considered as abetting the suicide of the complainant's son.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that there must be clear and proximate evidence of abetment, emphasizing that general allegations arising from civil disputes cannot suffice as basis for such claims under the law.

Result: FIR quashed.

Table of Content
1. details of fir and circumstances leading to suicide. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments against the fir regarding the absence of harassment. (Para 4 , 7)
3. observations regarding the relationship and ongoing civil suit. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
4. legal definitions and ingredients of abetment under ipc. (Para 10 , 11)
5. court’s reasoning on abetment and the necessity for proximate cause. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. clarification of mental state and circumstances required for suicide abetment. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
7. final analysis of evidence concerning abetting suicide. (Para 18 , 19)
8. conclusions drawn from evaluations of mental health factors. (Para 20 , 21)
9. quashing of fir due to lack of evidence for abetment. (Para 22 , 23)

Order :

ANIL KUMAR UPMAN, J.

1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), seeking the quashing of First Information Report (FIR) No.312/2021. This FIR was registered at Police Station, Bhatta Basti, District Jaipur City (North), for offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ).

2. The brief facts of the case are that the aforesaid FIR was lodged on 11.10.2021, on the complaint submitted by Smt. Neeta Mathur who is respondent No. 2 in this petition. It is stated by the complainant in her complaint that herself, her husband Shri Sunil Mathur, and her son Yash Mathur were residing in House No.4 D- 22 Housing Board, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. She further mentioned that her sister-in-law, Smt. Anita Mathur, had visited Jaipur for the last rites of the complainant’s father-in-law. It is alleged that, shortly before the death, Smt. Anita Mathur took advantage of her father-in-law's ill health to prepare a forged and fabricated Will concerning the house and multiple bank accounts. It is also alleged that this Will was subsequently utilized to file a civil suit aimed at usurping ornaments kept in a bank locker and the residential property. The FIR also specifies that Smt. Anita Mathur had filed several false complaints in the police station with intention to get them evicted from the aforementioned house. It is also alleged in the complaint that when the complainant’s son, Yash Mathur, was selected for the Indian Air Force, Smt. Anita Mathur filed a false complaint against him, allegedly to pressurize the family. Due to this very reason, his son was unable to complete his police verification, thereby stressing about his future, and consequently slid into depression. The FIR finally alleges that, despite counseling from friends, relatives, neighbours, and his father, the son frustrated by the continuous complaints filed against him, committed suicide on 10.10.2021, between approximately 5:00-5:30PM.

3. Before moving on, it is also pertinent to take note that the complainant-respondent No.2 in her reply to this petition has also brought the notice of this Court to a suicide note left by the deceased and same is being reproduced as under:-

I am Quitting because I am tired from my life since childhood. I have always seen my parents fighting on Different issues which makes me weak from inside But there love for me bring me energy too. Since 2013 After my Grandfather's death everything become Worst. My Aunty (Bhua) make our life like hell Since then everything became worse. She filed fake case & police complains to tease us. She passes out many negative comments at many moment This all make my mother mentally ill. She got an Brain Hamarage because of this shit. My Parents became fustrated & After Corona Our Economic Condition also get very low. So these circumstances forced me to do this Action. I am sorry mumma... I Love You

Yash Mathur"

4. Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that bare perusal of the FIR would reveal that no case under Section 306 of IPC is made out against the petitioners. Learned senior counsel argues that the suicide note, if taken at face value would further reveal that ther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top