PRANAY VERMA
Amicus Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Regional Provident Fund – Respondent
ORDER
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 20.10.2005 (Annexure P/24) passed by the respondent. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 31.03.2006 (Annexure P/31) passed by the respondent whereby the review preferred against the order dated 20.10.2005 has been dismissed.
2. As per the petitioner, it is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of pharmaceutical products. It has taken on rent premises situated at 44/A-45, Rambali Nagar, Industrial Area, Indore and a rent note was also entered into between the landlord and petitioner. In 1996, petitioner obtained a license for manufacturing drugs and pharmaceutical products under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. It got the petitioner factory registered under M.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1958 as well as under the Central Sales Tax Rules, Central Income Tax Rules and State Sales Tax Rules.
3. The petitioner received a notice dated 13.9.1996 from the respondent, wherein it was advised to report compliance of the Employees Provident Fund Act in respect of the employees under the code number allotted to M/s. Abri
An employee of a wholly owned subsidiary is entitled to provident fund benefits from the date of appointment, despite the subsidiary's later voluntary coverage under the EPF Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 7B of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the principles regarding the clubbing o....
The Court reaffirmed that a distinct entity under the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act is entitled to exemptions, emphasizing the need for procedural fairness in tribunal he....
Damages under Section 14B cannot be imposed without arrears; compliance with the Act negates default, and mens rea is not essential for penalties.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the violation of principles of natural justice in the decision-making process and the entitlement of the petitioner to a fresh consideration of the....
Point of law: validity/sustainability of the orders impugned cannot be enquired into in a writ proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India since the same requires consideration of vario....
An establishment employing more than 20 workers is covered under the Employees' Provident Fund Act, and failure to provide sufficient evidence to dispute its applicability leads to dismissal of certi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.