HARSH BUNGER
Consumer Electronics (Punjab) Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Harsh Bunger, J.
Petitioner [M/s Consumer Electronic (Punjab) Ltd.] has filed the instant Civil Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 04.05.2016 (Annexure P-5), passed by Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal.
2. Briefly, petitioner-M/s Consumer Electronic (Punjab) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'petitioner-Company') applied to the Authorities under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 1952 Act') seeking voluntary coverage of their company/establishment with effect from 01.05.1999. It appears that the petitioner-Company was allocated EPF Code PB/CHD/20801 with effect from 01.05.1999 under Section 1 (4) of 1952 Act, however, since the Competent Authority for issuance of Notification for Voluntary Coverage under Section 1 (4) of 1952 Act was Central Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi, accordingly, necessary documents were forwarded to the said authority and the proposal for issuance of voluntary coverage qua petitioner-Company was duly published in the Gazette of India, vide Notification dated 27.04.200
Associated Cement Companies Ltd., Chaibasa Cement Works, Jhinkpani v. Their Workmen
M/s L.N. Gadodia and Sons v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Management of Pratap Press v. Secy. Delhi Press Workers' Union
Noor Niwas Nursery Public School v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Rajasthan Prem Krishan Goods Transport Co. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Bombay Selection House
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Dharamsi Morarji Chemical Co. Ltd.
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Jaipur v. Naraini Udyog
An employee of a wholly owned subsidiary is entitled to provident fund benefits from the date of appointment, despite the subsidiary's later voluntary coverage under the EPF Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 7B of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the principles regarding the clubbing o....
Entities can be treated as one under the EPF Act based on unity of management, finance, and purpose, regardless of separate registration.
Coverage and application of EPF Act – In case two Institutions are interconnected, these can be clubbed for the purpose of coverage under EPF Act – Mere fact that two Institutes, managed and controll....
Establishments must demonstrate employment of 20 or more persons to qualify for coverage under the EPF Act, with management control and financial integrity being key considerations in determining app....
The employer must ensure EPF contributions for all employees, including those employed through contractors, and must comply with principles of natural justice in assessment proceedings.
The official liquidator must adjudicate and prioritize claims from workers and creditors according to statutory provisions, ensuring that dues to workers are paramount over other claims, aligning wit....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner to decide the entitlement of an employee to become a member and the date from which the e....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.