SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 117

VIVEK AGARWAL
Jayshree Dubey – Appellant
Versus
Central Information Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner in person; Dhananjay Kumar Mishra for respondents.

ORDER

1. This petition is filed being aggrieved of order dated 24.6.2024 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Central Information Commission refusing certain information as sought by the petitioner under Right to Information Act on the ground that such information is hit by the provisions contained in section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and so also by the provisions contained in section 11 of the said Act.

2. It is mentioned in the impugned order that information related to third party cannot be provided as denied by the third party and this information cannot be provided under section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act, 2005. It is further mentioned that information related to third party cannot be provided under rule 11 of the RTI Act, 2005.

3. Shri Dhananjay Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents admit that the authority which passed the order has wrongly mentioned 'Rule 11' whereas it is 'section 11'.

4. The application which was filed by the petitioner under the Right to Information Act is Annexure P-3, in which petitioner had sought following information :--

S. No.

Information sought by the applicant

Available Information

1

Total amount of alary and NPS contr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top