Back
G. S. AHLUWALIA
Siyaram Giri Goswami – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER
1. This application, under section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023, has been filed seeking following relief:-
"Thus, prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and the respondent may kindly be directed to ensure arrest of accused in pursuance to the FIR lodged and in the event he is absconding, proceedings under section 82 and 83 may kindly be directed to be initiated and investigation may also be directed to be done in expeditious manner so that the innocent can achieve justice in a time bound manner in the interest of justice."
2. It is submitted by counsel for applicant that on the complaint made by applicant, Crime No.375/2024 has been registered by Police Station Pohari, District Shivpuri, but no further action has been taken by the police and even accused persons have not been arrested.
3. So far as prayer made by applicant for issuing a direction to the police to arrest accused persons and filing of charge-sheet is concerned, the same cannot be granted.
4. The Supreme Court in the case of D. Venkatasubramaniam and others v. M.K. Mohan Krishnamachari and another reported in (2009) 10 SCC 488 has held as under :-
''19. The High Court, within a peri
The completion of investigation without unnecessary delay is mandated by law, and the court cannot supervise the investigation or give directions that would amount to supervising the investigation.
The court reaffirmed that police discretion in investigations must be respected, and judicial interference should be limited to exceptional circumstances.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
