SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 179

G. S. AHLUWALIA
Kamlesh Babu Shakya – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Babu Shakya – Respondent


Advocates:
Santosh Agrawal for petitioner; Harish Dixit with Nimesh Hardeniya for respondent No. 1.

ORDER

1. This revision under section 115 of CPC has been filed against the order dated 30.4.2025 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Gohad, District Bhind passed in MCA No. 25/2022.

2. It is really surprising that the Presiding Officer was exercising the civil jurisdiction but still he has signed the order in the capacity of Second Additional Sessions Judge, Gohad, District Bhind. Either the concerning Presiding Officer is not aware of distinction between civil jurisdiction and criminal jurisdiction or he is negligent in signing the orders.

3. The facts necessary for disposal of this revision in short are that respondent / plaintiff filed a civil suit. On 17.5.2006, a direction was given to the respondent / plaintiff to pay the process fee for service of notice on defendant No. 3. However, the process fee was not paid. Thereafter, on 26.8.2006, an application was filed by the respondent / plaintiff seeking permission to pay the process fee which was allowed. In spite of that, process fee was not paid. On 26.8.2006, 25.9.2006, 16.11.2006, and 23.12.2006, process fee was not paid for service of notice on defendant No. 3. On 25.1.2007, neither plaintiff nor his counsel was presen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top